S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

carbon fiber crash test

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:02 PM
  #1  
phonedrn8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nv
Default carbon fiber crash test

here is question about carbon fiber parts how safe are they in the a crash? what kind of testing do they stand up to.. and is there any regulation from DOT on them
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:13 PM
  #2  
chuhsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,412
Likes: 4
From: San Francisco
Default

curious as well...
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:22 PM
  #3  
zeroptzero's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 3,889
From: Ontario Canada
Default

highly unlikely that any common vendor around these forums pays the funds necessary to certify and crash test their carbon fiber parts. Outside of carbon fiber helmets I can't see any vendor of parts like Hartops, hoods, fenders, etc.... receiving DOT approval.

The common belief is that carbon fiber is stronger than steel. This may be true on a pound-for-pound basis. Carbon fiber that is layed for applications such as Indycar and F1 racecars can be engineered to be very strong and dissipate energy in crashes extremely well, but the stuff you find for sale for our vehicles tend to be lightweight parts with relatively low crash worthiness strength IMO. This is just my opinion from parts that I've seen over the years.

When you get into very high end applications I know there are companies that can engineer carbon fiber parts with great strength and crash worthiness but you won't find that with parts commonly sold for our cars. I think companies like Mugen and Spoon might have the resources to absorb the expense involved in certifying and testing parts, but I can't say that I've ever seen data provided by them on any of their parts.

I would never buy a carbon fiber part from a vendor based on it being crash-worthy, it seems that most of those parts are sold for cosmetic upgrades along with weight saving properties. Well engineered carbon fiber race parts yes, stuff being made in some guy's basement or workshop not likely. Keeping the discussion based on the typical part that you may find in the general vending community that we see on a daily basis, not million dollar parts you see in F1.
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:24 PM
  #4  
4bang6's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Default

Tensile strength Density Specific strength
Carbon fibre 3.50 1.75 2.00
Steel 1.30 7.90 0.17


F1 uses it for their entire suspension
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:25 PM
  #5  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Yeah most carbon fiber after market parts are really not strong at all!
A lot are also carbon fiber overlaying fiberglass or something.
Most parts made in carbon fiber are for looks and looks alone.
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:27 PM
  #6  
4bang6's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Default

it has to do with how the fiber is laid....direction wise

Carbonfibre is a non isotrope material. That means that all fibres have to point the same direction as the forcelines through the material. If this is not the case, there will be an opposite effect. To be understandable, wood is also not isotrope, aluminium and copper are for sure.
You can also notice on the table that carbon fibres are 3 times stronger and more than 4 times leighter than steel!
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:29 PM
  #7  
Jphoa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
Default

werd. A lot of aftermarket manufacturers lay CF over fiberglass mainly to save on cost and to provide maximum profit.

Trending Topics

Old 11-04-2010 | 12:11 AM
  #8  
ahrmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 4bang6,Nov 3 2010, 06:27 PM
it has to do with how the fiber is laid....direction wise

Carbonfibre is a non isotrope material. That means that all fibres have to point the same direction as the forcelines through the material. If this is not the case, there will be an opposite effect. To be understandable, wood is also not isotrope, aluminium and copper are for sure.
You can also notice on the table that carbon fibres are 3 times stronger and more than 4 times leighter than steel!
CF is stiffer, yes...but not "tougher" toughness is what counts in crashes since its how much energy it can absorb before it fails. Best way to put it... think of a rubber ball vs. a glass ball. The glass ball will definitely be stiffer and more structural...but imagine dropping it, it just shatters because its STIFF but not "tough" - it doesnt have any rubbery give to it (malleability/ductility).
Old 11-04-2010 | 01:00 AM
  #9  
H22toF20's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Clatskanie, OR
Default

Roll cages are made for a reason.
Old 11-04-2010 | 02:32 AM
  #10  
ahrmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by H22toF20,Nov 3 2010, 10:00 PM
Roll cages are made for a reason.
but thats why they're made of chromoly steel.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM.