Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wedsport TC105N - face differences?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-29-2010 | 04:33 AM
  #1  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: PA (near Pittsburgh)
Default Wedsport TC105N - face differences?

Hey guys. Im looking to possibly pick up a set of Weds TC105N, and Im slightly concerned about the look of them in the sizes Im considering. Obviously the "RR" face is the most concave, and the "R" face is slightly more flat (as they list pictures of both on the website), but does anyone know how the look changes when you get to the FR and FF faces? If I go 18" Im going with offsets in the mid 30s, which will get me "R" faces, although Im considering dropping down to a 17", and in the same offset that changes them to an "FR" face. Does anyone know how these will look compared to the R face? More specifically Id like pictures of the 17.8.5 and 17x9.5 +32. Thanks!
Old 12-29-2010 | 06:57 AM
  #2  
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 3
Default

Try this

http://www.upgrademotoring.com/wheels/weds...port_tc105n.htm
Old 12-29-2010 | 06:58 AM
  #3  
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 3
Default

I mean I know it doesn't help a TON but it seems like with that wheel there is not a huge difference.
Old 12-30-2010 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
Vik2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 4
From: Behind You
Default

just google image rr and r. RR more concave
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Derick
Wheels and Tires
2
07-09-2012 07:25 AM
whitejdms2k
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
3
10-22-2011 08:52 AM
s2k dre
Wheels and Tires
18
07-08-2009 09:08 AM
iceple
The S2000 Gallery
25
02-23-2004 09:51 AM
Aaron
Wheels and Tires
23
05-16-2003 06:02 PM



Quick Reply: Wedsport TC105N - face differences?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 PM.