Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Subtleties of tire width...

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-30-2006, 04:01 PM
  #1  
Moderator
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,993
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default Subtleties of tire width...

Hi, I've been poking around the stickies and reading up on tires, and maybe I missed it, but is there any discussion on the differences experienced when using slightly wider tires on our cars? The reason I ask is that I see many people opting for (on MY04+) 225 over 215 and 255 over 245 on stock rims with no rubbing issues, but what is the reasoning behind this?

I can think of looks and a wider contact patch as benefits, and rolling resistance and friction as drawbacks, but is there a good reason to go with wider tires, or will I notice any difference? Is there really any point in going up one size?

Thanks, and if there's a thread on this, I'd love a link!
Old 04-30-2006, 04:25 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
CoastS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New London, CT
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Street only? Autocross? Track? The effect wider rear tires have on your car will depend on what kind of driving your're doing.
Old 04-30-2006, 05:39 PM
  #3  
Moderator
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,993
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Okay, so I am looking at tire width during normal and spirited driving on roads, not autocrossing or tracking the car. I think I understand that wider rear or front tires will effect the car's turning response, but is there any benefit to going wider on all four corners at the same time?

Thanks,
Old 05-01-2006, 04:38 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
CoastS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New London, CT
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you go wider front and rear, and maintain the same front/rear stagger (the difference in section width between the front and rear tires) you'll end up with more total grip, in theory.

The tradeoffs are going to be increased unsprung weight, road noise, maybe even a decrease in fuel economy. Not to mention bigger tires will be more expensive. Not sure on the exact sizes you're looking at, but you might introduce speedometer error and change the gearing of the car if your wider tires are also taller or shorter than OEM.

IMHO, if all you're going to do is drive the car on the street, your AP2 doesn't really need any more rubber. Just stick with the OEM bridgestones, they're very good.

If you're interested in getting better turn-in/reducing the AP2's tendency to understeer, I recommend an alignment change rather than tire change.
Old 05-01-2006, 05:52 AM
  #5  
Moderator
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,993
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

I'm looking at the Kumho Ecsta MX's, but I can't find their tread width listed, so my best guess is that the fronts on 215s are 8.46" and on 225 they are 8.56".

Looking at my stock Re050s, the tread width is listed as 6.7" - much narrower than the recommended Kumho tire, so to offset this, I'm thinking of fatter rear rubber - Since the Kumhos in theory don't grip as well as the Bridgestones, would getting fatter tires (at least on the rear) help maintin grip levels?

Also, I do plan to get the car realigned when I get new tires, but I'm happy with the turn-in now, and like to keep it as close as I can with the new tires.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drexelmech
Wheels and Tires
16
08-05-2009 06:56 AM
crazee928
Wheels and Tires
4
01-16-2008 02:15 PM
skullbang
Wheels and Tires
0
10-15-2007 11:16 PM
S2005x
Wheels and Tires
3
06-26-2007 08:25 PM
Doug0716
Wheels and Tires
2
07-27-2005 02:45 AM



Quick Reply: Subtleties of tire width...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.