Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Star Spec review from a Daily Driver perspective

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-16-2011, 05:47 AM
  #11  
Registered User

 
takeshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by street_ruler
people, i never said anything about nationals, racing or anything. frankly, i dont care about that. notice that the title is about daily driven tires. nothing about racing. keep it in perspective.
Ok. So how, exactly, are the Yokohamas and Bridgestones "a whole different realm of performance" (your words, verbatim) in daily driving if they're not on the track/autocross?
Old 09-16-2011, 07:03 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
street_ruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its more or less an opinion like the rest of this thread/my posts in this thread. Ive had better luck with the bridgestones as far as "feel" of the car and noise. admittedly noise doesnt really apply here but its something to know. Also i personally think that the bridgestones, although a summer tire, deal with water a little better. i live in washington and it rains alot here. its a consideration even if the car is a summer only car. never know when its going to burst into a downpour.

as for the yoks, well i just like em. maybe thats just some bias.
Old 09-16-2011, 07:04 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
street_ruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Originally Posted by street_ruler' timestamp='1316157683' post='20978283
people, i never said anything about nationals, racing or anything. frankly, i dont care about that. notice that the title is about daily driven tires. nothing about racing. keep it in perspective.
???

Here's what you said that we took issue with:
Additionally they are expensive enough that it is not worth saving 100 dollars to buy them over bridgestones/yokohama’s. The increase of 100 dollars would put you into a whole different realm of performance.
Persepective: That's utter b.s., the star specs are in *exactly* the same realm of performance as the b'stones/yoks.


if you take issue with a opinion of a tire via written review, maybe you care way too much.
Old 09-16-2011, 11:27 AM
  #14  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 125 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

You take the time/space to write up a review of a tire and then (unintentionally I'm sure) make misleading comments about that tire's relative performance vs. other similar tires, I'd say you care way too much on the one hand but at the same time not nearly enough on the other!
Old 09-16-2011, 12:27 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
street_ruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

glad i could help
Old 09-16-2011, 12:42 PM
  #16  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had Star Specs, then NT01's, then AD08's on my NC MX-5. I preferred the AD08's independent of price, though the Star Specs were a better value.
Old 09-19-2011, 09:08 AM
  #17  
Registered User

 
S2KMiyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up in yo $hit
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great review!

The only thing I'd add is the fact that they are pretty noisy tires. Granted, I do not have personal experience with the other stickier compound tires like Advan Neovas or Michelin PS2's, but this is my second set of Star Specs.

I drive my car on a daily basis and the sticky compund definitely does not help with low speed steering. It is noticibly heavier, but yes you do get used to it.

As for the size, are you sure you did not pick up 225/45/17's? A while ago I was looking to replace my stock sizes but I didn't think they produced the fronts in 215/45/17's. The smallest sizes (to match the diameter w/ the fronts) were 225/45/17 and 255/40/17.

The only other thing about the tires is the noise/vibration; but it's expected with the stickyness.
Old 09-19-2011, 10:02 AM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
street_ruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

100% positive on the 215/45.

as for noise i did notice that the construction of the center rib actually gets wider as it wears. it looked as if it had a stepped shoulder so after X percentage of wear it would begin getting into that second width. i do wonder if that contributes to the noise.
Old 09-22-2011, 08:50 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
lltysonll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metairie/Larose
Posts: 1,948
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

nice review, they still offer the rebate on these tires? I just ordered a set.
Old 09-23-2011, 06:42 AM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
street_ruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

REVIEW UPDATED


Quick Reply: Star Spec review from a Daily Driver perspective



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 AM.