Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

rpf1 question

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-20-2013 | 05:15 PM
  #1  
NoLogix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default rpf1 question

Hey I've been looking through the rpf1 threads but I can't seem to find my answer...I'd like to get a set of rpf1 for track and street use with a somewhat agressive look without having to do fender works and from my research it looked like 17x8 +45 and 17x9+45 would be great with a 225 45 17 and 255 40 17 although I'm not quite sure if it meets my requirement. Also what would it do if instead of going 17x8 in front I'd go 17x9? Would it be more concave? I'd like to keep the handling balance perfect as it is too. No understeer neither oversteer. Is it possible with this setup?
Old 11-20-2013 | 05:27 PM
  #2  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 356
From: Seattle WA
Default

What year is your S?

With any of the setups you have listed you will have to roll your fenders and relocate the rear tabs. If you want no fender work you want the PF01 in the +60 offset. You can do 17x9 +45 all around but again you will need to roll fenders and the car will feel different with the added grip up front.
Old 11-20-2013 | 06:11 PM
  #3  
NoLogix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

My car is bone stock. I'd have to roll the fenders even with stock height?
Old 11-20-2013 | 06:12 PM
  #4  
NoLogix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Oups sorry didn't read correctly. It's a 2003
Old 11-20-2013 | 06:47 PM
  #5  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 356
From: Seattle WA
Default

Yes.
Old 11-21-2013 | 03:15 PM
  #6  
NoLogix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Ok and what is the difference between the 8 vs 9 width? Is it more concave?
Old 11-21-2013 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 356
From: Seattle WA
Default

I believe the face on the 9's is the more concave face and the 8's have a convex face. Someone that has RFP1's can probably chime in and confirm.

Trending Topics

Old 11-21-2013 | 05:10 PM
  #8  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,060
Likes: 556
Default

Originally Posted by Manga_Spawn
I believe the face on the 9's is the more concave face and the 8's have a convex face. Someone that has RFP1's can probably chime in and confirm.
Yes that's correct. The switch over point is from 8.5" to 9" widths.
Old 11-21-2013 | 07:36 PM
  #9  
NoLogix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Ok and if i'd go with 17x9 +45 on each corners, do I have to roll the fe ders a lot of just a bit?
Old 11-21-2013 | 08:03 PM
  #10  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,060
Likes: 556
Default

Originally Posted by NoLogix
Ok and if i'd go with 17x9 +45 on each corners, do I have to roll the fe ders a lot of just a bit?
Never heard of someone rolling the fenders just a bit. Either you do it or you don't

Yes you need to do it front and rear, and you better run no less then -2 camber up front or you will be pulling them too (assuming your running at least a 225)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 PM.