Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rear Tire Width vs. MPG (What's your experience?)

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-05-2007 | 05:42 PM
  #21  
Suzukaboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=deathsled,Jul 5 2007, 02:02 PM]I didnt notice a difference in MPG when I replaced my stock AP2 rears with 255/40/17 falken azenis, but now that
Old 07-07-2007 | 06:25 AM
  #22  
JPSMAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Something else worth noting......the type of tire/compound could have a minor effect on MPG. It wouldn't be drastic, but I think it could be 1-1.5 MPG. I noticed this on other vehicles when switching to Michelin from a Dunlop.

I guess the only way to really test this is to keep the same tire model and just increase/decrease the size.
Old 07-07-2007 | 09:22 AM
  #23  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35,993
Likes: 215
From: Queen City, NC
Default

On my original RE050s I got 26+ city/31+ mpg highway. With Kumho Ecsta MX 215/255 I got about 24 city/27 mpg highway. With 225/255 RE050A on the car I'm getting 26 mpg in the city - no highway yet - , so I think that more than width, the natural rolling resistance of the tires makes a difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
street_ruler
Pacific Northwest S2000 Owners
7
07-22-2008 04:53 PM
skullbang
Wheels and Tires
0
10-16-2007 12:16 AM
dmw16
Wheels and Tires
2
08-04-2006 07:24 AM
CyberCJP
Wheels and Tires
10
07-03-2006 08:43 PM
BobF
Wheels and Tires
3
05-31-2005 03:26 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 AM.