RE050A PP rear tire wear on AP2
#22
The OEM RE050 tires have the same 140 treadwear rating as *most* of the RE050A Pole Positions. It was pointed out that *some* sizes of the non-OEM RE050A Pole Position (including stock rear size) have a 280 rating.
I figure it's gotta be a mistake, though. Why would a few selected sizes of the same model tire have sufficiently different compound and/or construction to have TWICE the treadwear rating?
I figure it's gotta be a mistake, though. Why would a few selected sizes of the same model tire have sufficiently different compound and/or construction to have TWICE the treadwear rating?
#23
Registered User
Originally Posted by ZDan,Feb 6 2008, 05:54 PM
The OEM RE050 tires have the same 140 treadwear rating as *most* of the RE050A Pole Positions. It was pointed out that *some* sizes of the non-OEM RE050A Pole Position (including stock rear size) have a 280 rating.
I figure it's gotta be a mistake, though. Why would a few selected sizes of the same model tire have sufficiently different compound and/or construction to have TWICE the treadwear rating?
I figure it's gotta be a mistake, though. Why would a few selected sizes of the same model tire have sufficiently different compound and/or construction to have TWICE the treadwear rating?
#24
On the OEM RE050 MZ I would get 4.5k miles out of rears before they reached 3mm depth when I change them. Just road driving, perfect wear pattern, would be changing every 3-4 months. Sent them back to Bridgestone UK, they said tyres checked out fine.
After three sets I swapped to Dunlop SP Sportmaxx or Goodyear F1 GSD-3 for about 8.5k miles out of a set of rears.
Change brand or driving style (less fun) if not happy would be my view.
After three sets I swapped to Dunlop SP Sportmaxx or Goodyear F1 GSD-3 for about 8.5k miles out of a set of rears.
Change brand or driving style (less fun) if not happy would be my view.
#27
Registered User
I'm reviving this tread. Since this threads start, I upgraded my OEM 245 RE050, to the 255/40/17 Pole Position's in the rear.
I got about 15k out of the OEM RE050. I only got about 10k out of the 255 PP's.
I did notice something a little unusual though. The 255 Pole Postions were worn more in the center of the tire than the inside and outside. I know this can be caused by higher than optimal tire pressures, but I check my tire pressures almost weekly, and always kept them at 32-33psi. So I don't quite understand why they wore that way.
If the center had as much life left as the inside and outside I could have gotten maybe 5-8k more out of the tire life.
Just thought I would post my review and comments on this tire.
I got about 15k out of the OEM RE050. I only got about 10k out of the 255 PP's.
I did notice something a little unusual though. The 255 Pole Postions were worn more in the center of the tire than the inside and outside. I know this can be caused by higher than optimal tire pressures, but I check my tire pressures almost weekly, and always kept them at 32-33psi. So I don't quite understand why they wore that way.
If the center had as much life left as the inside and outside I could have gotten maybe 5-8k more out of the tire life.
Just thought I would post my review and comments on this tire.
#28
Originally Posted by Ch0pper,Apr 12 2009, 09:31 AM
I'm reviving this tread. Since this threads start, I upgraded my OEM 245 RE050, to the 255/40/17 Pole Position's in the rear.
I got about 15k out of the OEM RE050. I only got about 10k out of the 255 PP's.
I did notice something a little unusual though. The 255 Pole Postions were worn more in the center of the tire than the inside and outside. I know this can be caused by higher than optimal tire pressures, but I check my tire pressures almost weekly, and always kept them at 32-33psi. So I don't quite understand why they wore that way.
If the center had as much life left as the inside and outside I could have gotten maybe 5-8k more out of the tire life.
Just thought I would post my review and comments on this tire.
I got about 15k out of the OEM RE050. I only got about 10k out of the 255 PP's.
I did notice something a little unusual though. The 255 Pole Postions were worn more in the center of the tire than the inside and outside. I know this can be caused by higher than optimal tire pressures, but I check my tire pressures almost weekly, and always kept them at 32-33psi. So I don't quite understand why they wore that way.
If the center had as much life left as the inside and outside I could have gotten maybe 5-8k more out of the tire life.
Just thought I would post my review and comments on this tire.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post