Opinion on Kuhmo Ecsta MX ?
#1
Buying aftermarket wheels soon but rear tires really expensive since it's going to be 255/40/17. SO3's in that size is $199 each. Kuhmo Ecsta MX is $129 each. I know you get what you pay for but in this case would I be giving up a lot in terms of performance by going with Kuhmo Ecsta MX?
#2
Former Sponsor
The MX is the best handling bang for the buck tire I have. The S03 is a better all around tire but the MX is comparable. The S03 will have better wet traction than the MX.
In the testing that was done here the MX was better handling than the Pilot Sport and the Yokohama AVS Sport.
I don't think you would be disappointed at all.
If I can help let me know.
Thank you
Jim 800-428-8355-364
In the testing that was done here the MX was better handling than the Pilot Sport and the Yokohama AVS Sport.
I don't think you would be disappointed at all.
If I can help let me know.
Thank you
Jim 800-428-8355-364
#5
Jim- Does the Kuhmo Ecsta MX 225/50/16 have the same tread width as the OEM 225/50/60's? Are they comparable tire?
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: houston
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
get them for it the summer. they that forever to break in. i could not go over 70 mph without them doing funny things for the first 1000 miles! after that, they were good, not great. i am on 712's now