Offset Rule of Thumb...
06-23-2005, 12:40 PM
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: dallas, texas
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David b,Jun 23 2005, 12:21 PM
Downhill I don't know about the % issue, but I am local to you and I can show you that your ranges are wrong. I don't need math, I have video, scrapes on the inside of the wheel wells, etc., etc.
It all depends upon how skinny a tire you are willing to run. If you want to run a tire that is really as wide or wider than stock then your low offsets won't work.
As I mentioned before you have to check actual widths on the tires, you cannot go by carcass sizes which is all the rated size is (+-10%). When the tread is added you get very widely varying actual widths.
In other words a 255 isn't always 255 wide.
It all depends upon how skinny a tire you are willing to run. If you want to run a tire that is really as wide or wider than stock then your low offsets won't work.
As I mentioned before you have to check actual widths on the tires, you cannot go by carcass sizes which is all the rated size is (+-10%). When the tread is added you get very widely varying actual widths.
In other words a 255 isn't always 255 wide.
i understand that actual tire width is part of the rub equation. what low offsets are you talking about? i think you misunderstood that chart.....thats what the other guy posted. he said to memorize an offset chart.
my original post was in regards to a rim fitting...leaving the tire out of the equation. since there are literally thousands of combinations if you add in tires.
is anyone actually reading my posts?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shingles
S2000 Talk
0
06-21-2001 07:38 PM