offset downfalls?
12-11-2006, 08:30 PM
#21
Registered User
![[AP2-2NV]'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%238c44db' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>[</text></svg>)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OBSeRiouso,Dec 7 2006, 05:00 PM
you can run a 245 but you have to run mad negative camber
you can run a 245 and roll your fender and run slight negative camber
you can run a 235 and and be on stock fender/stock alignment.
you can run a 225 up front, but run negative camber and not rub.
you can run a 215 up front and be perfect. No rubbing.
you can run a 245 and roll your fender and run slight negative camber
you can run a 235 and and be on stock fender/stock alignment.
you can run a 225 up front, but run negative camber and not rub.
you can run a 215 up front and be perfect. No rubbing.
245 and slight roll on the back would take care of it. or 245 and around 2-3 degrees of negative camber, but a slight roll would work just fine if you dont want more camber.
![[AP2-2NV] is offline](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/s2ki/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
12-16-2006, 11:12 PM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
