Non Staggered set need help
#1
Non Staggered set need help
So the time has come to purchase new shoes for my AP2... I have been researching like crazy but can't find an answer I am looking for. I am wanting to stick with a 17 and run a non staggered setup that I can rotate the tires front and rear with no problem I believe I have read somewhere about a good setup with 17x8 F/R with 245s all around. Does anyone have any input on this currently im running the stock AP2 V2 wheels with 215/F 255/R.
#2
Stock setup has "stagger", is "staggered". Not "staggard"!
You want to go non-staggered, why?
245s want to be on 8.5" wheels, which you have in back already with stock ap2 rears. Why do you want to go to skinnier rears?
Nothing magic about non-staggered, particularly for a non track car without appropriate suspension setup. For a street car, I prefer stagger because lighter-weight and narrower fronts gives better handling feel. For a track setup, I wouldn't limit rear tire size based on what fits up front. Wouldn't rule out non-staggered, but wouldn't insist on it either. It's just another part of setup. Generally you'd want to maximize tire width. If wider tires fit in back, I wouldn't limit rear size just so they're the same as the fronts.
Rotatability isn't that big a deal, to me either. Overall wear rate is the same. Benefits of non-staggered being rotatable are IMO minor to non-existent.
You want to go non-staggered, why?
245s want to be on 8.5" wheels, which you have in back already with stock ap2 rears. Why do you want to go to skinnier rears?
Nothing magic about non-staggered, particularly for a non track car without appropriate suspension setup. For a street car, I prefer stagger because lighter-weight and narrower fronts gives better handling feel. For a track setup, I wouldn't limit rear tire size based on what fits up front. Wouldn't rule out non-staggered, but wouldn't insist on it either. It's just another part of setup. Generally you'd want to maximize tire width. If wider tires fit in back, I wouldn't limit rear size just so they're the same as the fronts.
Rotatability isn't that big a deal, to me either. Overall wear rate is the same. Benefits of non-staggered being rotatable are IMO minor to non-existent.
#3
I like to push my car in/through turns, so I am looking for contact. I was thinking of a 225F/255R on 17x8 and 17x9 setup as well but I have heard some good reviews of non staggered setups so thats why I have been looking, I have good suspension setup and it will be even better in a couple months when I am stationed back in the states along with better brakes. I am just in the market for summer wheels and tires thus my question.
#6
In all reality the only thing being more narrow then a factory setting would be the rear rim which a 8 inch wide wheel can handle a 245 tire easily which is a factory size on an ap2, and thats a good jump in size width on the front in both aspects as far as wheel and tire goes. I was just trying to find out what a better setup is... a square 245 on all four corners or 225/255 on 17x8/9, for smooth, quick, precise handling.
Trending Topics
#10
with a square 17x9 setup and 255 front and rear will I have to roll the fenders? the 17x9's i was looking at are +60 offset