Heatcycled Star Specs?
#12
Originally Posted by aCab,May 23 2010, 04:45 PM
I assume you know that driving them in cold weather makes them harder too, right? They won't ever achieve the same performance they had before such an experience.
#13
For reference, here are the time trial results from the Monticello event a few weeks back: http://www.comscc.org/events/results...?id=2010-05-04
I did a best timed lap in the 2:54's on 205/225 Star Specs vs. the McParland's mostly-stock-for-the-moment S2k in the 2:50's and 2:51's on 4x 255 NT01's.
Not too terribly far off the pace considering narrower street tires vs. wider R-comps.
The point being, my rear star specs at the wear bars hadn't lost much if any grip, I don't think. With 2/32 rear tread depth and 6/32 front tread depth, balance was neutral, it seemed to me a touch more understeer than usual if anything.
I did a best timed lap in the 2:54's on 205/225 Star Specs vs. the McParland's mostly-stock-for-the-moment S2k in the 2:50's and 2:51's on 4x 255 NT01's.
Not too terribly far off the pace considering narrower street tires vs. wider R-comps.
The point being, my rear star specs at the wear bars hadn't lost much if any grip, I don't think. With 2/32 rear tread depth and 6/32 front tread depth, balance was neutral, it seemed to me a touch more understeer than usual if anything.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post