Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Falken Azenis

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-28-2007, 12:35 AM
  #11  
Registered User

 
xdavieexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ORANGE COUNTY, SOUTH CALI
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They are very quiet tires so if you break out you won't even hear them squeal.
Old 04-28-2007, 03:09 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
600rr_rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've had 3.5 sets of Azenis for about 20,000 miles now...about a 1/4 dedicated to track time.

My opinions:

1) Track - They are very nice on the track...great grip and I've seen plenty of Azenis owners posting great lap times.

2) Durability - Uh, yeah they don't get great milege with a 200 treadwear rating. But they are high performance street tires...what do you expect?

3) Value - In terms of performance / cost ratio, I'd say Azenis would rank somewhat high.

4) Rain - They SUCK. I've driven them at the track and on streets/highways in the rain, they are terrible. Just look at the tread pattern... Be very careful in the rain on these tires...

Overall, I'd rank them very good in my limited tire experience. However, I am looking to mix-it-up and I am switching to Bridgestone RE050's soon. I've heard great reviews (stinkytofu had a good one...can't find link...)

Cheers
Old 04-28-2007, 06:47 AM
  #13  
Former Moderator

 
negcamber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Have a set now...rain is scary. Mine haven't lasted too long...but then they have a couple autoxes and a Dragon on them. I might get 6k miles on the rears.

One big drawback I found is that these tires are very heavy. I have 17" CE28N + 255s in the rear and that combo is 2lb heavier than oem ap1 wheels with a 245 Hankook RS2. Now it's a lot more rubber, but the CE28Ns are a lot lighter than the oem wheels. I can really feel the weight on acceleration.
Old 04-28-2007, 07:06 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Aze85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: No.VA
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how are the sidewalls? stiffer than the oem re050?
i have the kumhos and i am dissapointed in the sidewall stiffness
Old 04-28-2007, 07:08 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
CobraTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Check out the Hankook Z212 RS2 as well. For driving on the street, they should handle water better than the Azenis and provide nearly the same amount of grip. They'll also be cheaper in the same sizes.
Old 04-28-2007, 07:40 AM
  #16  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Mister Jew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dade County
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

i was gonna get neo gens for the fronts. wish they had them in the back but they dont. i had them on my type r hatch for over 2 years and i had a big drop and, they never wore out. They are designed for extreme camber on cars.
Old 04-28-2007, 08:24 AM
  #17  
Registered User

 
NFRGUAMBOMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 947
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I believe the hankook r-s2 is comparable in price and performance.
Old 04-28-2007, 11:21 AM
  #18  
Registered User

 
iam7head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pasadena, SOCAL
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danielblancaflor,Apr 28 2007, 08:24 AM
I believe the hankook r-s2 is comparable in price and performance.
again, according to GRM, the federal 595rs is very similar to RS2, but without the cost.

no one on ap2 running 615? what size are you guy running for the rear?
Old 04-28-2007, 01:38 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
deathsled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont know why everyone is saying rain performance sucks

They can handle "ordinary" driving in the rain just fine, I do 70mph in the rain on the highway with them no problem. You just better slow down when its time for a real turn, which you should know to do because its raining.

I probably drive at 3/4 the performance of my normal daily driving in the rain with the azenis without a problem

on AP2 just run the 255/40/17 in the rear. For the front you can either run the 215 or 225. The 215 will bias you more towards understeer and the 225 will bring you towards oversteer land (which is nice for the ap2) supposing you put the 255 in the rear
Old 04-30-2007, 07:33 AM
  #20  
Registered User

 
vtec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Apr 28 2007, 12:27 AM
Wet performance is not good - don't go above 60 mph on the highway at full to 3/4 tread. If you're under 1/2 tread, go 50-55. If you're at 1/4 tread and you're on the highway when it's raining - god help you.

With that said, dry performance is incredible.
Ok, that depends solely on how much water is on the road.


Quick Reply: Falken Azenis



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.