Critique my alignment
#1
Critique my alignment
So I had orginally planned on going -1.0 in the front and -2.0 in the rear, 0 toe front, and min. toe rear. After taking with the shop, they suggested that if the car was plowing (as it was) then more camber up front was the remedy. Well, I get back to the shop and these are the specs. What do you think?
#2
Definitely better but a lot of it has to do with what you use the car for and how you drive it.
I only drive the s2k once a week and do some autocross/track throughout the year and at -2.8f/-3.1r on RS3s I'm still getting more outside wear than inside. I've got camber joints to toss on the car then I'm going to try -3.3 all around and hope that it doesn't throw off the balance too much. I'm happy with the way it handles but I'd like to even out the tire wear a bit more.
I only drive the s2k once a week and do some autocross/track throughout the year and at -2.8f/-3.1r on RS3s I'm still getting more outside wear than inside. I've got camber joints to toss on the car then I'm going to try -3.3 all around and hope that it doesn't throw off the balance too much. I'm happy with the way it handles but I'd like to even out the tire wear a bit more.
#6
Rear toe-in is of the DEVIL! When I tried it on purpose, it sucked. When it crept back in without my knowledge (loose adjusters?), I was dumbstruck by how AWFUL the car handled (all over the place in a straight line in the wet or over bumps, but wouldn't turn in for the world when presented with an actual corner). Totally relieved when I found out that's all it was, I'd thought the car was possessed!
Even ignoring 2x or greater rear tire wear rate, excessive rear toe-in sux for driveability and handling 4 realzies...
Even ignoring 2x or greater rear tire wear rate, excessive rear toe-in sux for driveability and handling 4 realzies...
#7
So since Raleigh only has fun corners when turning right, does it stand to reason that my alignment was totally fubar on the right do to taking only right hand corners much harder than left?