Cannot find 225/45/16 for '03 rears in all season
#12
Thing 1: Greater tread width does NOT mean a bigger contact patch.
Thing 2: Even if it did, more contact patch does not necessarily imply greater traction. Tire make/model, compound and construction are infinitely more important than outright size.
My concern is not ride quality but handling at the limit.
The grip advantage of wider tires isn't even that much in ideal, at the track where you can get full heat into the tires, in warm dry conditions. My fastest time at Watkins Glen in my stock '01 was 2:20.5 with 225/50-16 front, 245/45-16 rear Kumho VictoRacer DOT R-comp tires (brand new that event).
The next year, under the same conditions, no driver improvement (been to WGI many times), I did a 2:21.4 on narrower 205/55-16 front, 225/50-16 rear Dunlop StarSpec *street* tires.
There just isn't anything much in terms of real-world grip with wider tires. Particularly for all-seasons, there's not a compelling reason to insist on 245s.
I don't want to spend the money on larger wheels and am forced at this point to buy rears in 225/50 R 16. My question is what brand/model of tires people like best in this size combination. Jim suggests Conti's are liked a lot by S2K owners. Anything else? Kumho's look to be a bargain. How do they work?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post