Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Advan RGIII

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-21-2019 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,059
Likes: 555
Default

OP, option 2. With a 225/255 stagger.
Old 10-21-2019 | 02:53 PM
  #12  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 356
From: Seattle WA
Default

Bruv= Bro or Brother. Bruv is sort of the British version of Bro.
Old 10-21-2019 | 06:15 PM
  #13  
512S2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 489
Likes: 77
Default

Originally Posted by Manga_Spawn
Bruv= Bro or Brother. Bruv is sort of the British version of Bro.
Also synonymous with Bruh and, Brah -both more fratty iterations..
Old 10-21-2019 | 10:11 PM
  #14  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 356
From: Seattle WA
Default

See also brosef, brocacho etc.
Old 10-22-2019 | 08:27 AM
  #15  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,059
Likes: 555
Default



I was being a bit facetious. The urban is strong here my Bruv's

Last edited by s2000Junky; 10-22-2019 at 08:35 AM.
Old 10-24-2019 | 03:16 PM
  #16  
BiondoVtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

I am confused!!!
I emailed back and forth with the Guys @ Fitment Industries.
They are saying that their recommended setup for the front is F 8 +38 and R 9 +45.
I thought this is too aggressive for stock fenders.
What do u guys think?
Old 10-24-2019 | 03:30 PM
  #17  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,059
Likes: 555
Default

Originally Posted by BiondoVtec
I am confused!!!
I emailed back and forth with the Guys @ Fitment Industries.
They are saying that their recommended setup for the front is F 8 +38 and R 9 +45.
I thought this is too aggressive for stock fenders.
What do u guys think?
Yes too aggressive, unless you want to stretch some skinny tires on, which is lame. The salesperson wasn't giving you proper info.

Higher numerical offset you have listed in #2 is less aggressive.
Old 10-24-2019 | 05:13 PM
  #18  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 356
From: Seattle WA
Default

Way to aggressive. I would talk to one of the vendors on here since they are more familiar with the car. Kamispeed, Evasive, etc can get these wheels for you and are more familiar with the car. Don't trust what some random sales rep on a website is trying to push on you.
Old 10-24-2019 | 06:35 PM
  #19  
BiondoVtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks will do...
I appreciate u guys!!!
Old 10-24-2019 | 11:24 PM
  #20  
Hanid33's Avatar
Registered User

 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default RG3

Originally Posted by BiondoVtec
Hi guys,
I am on the market for some RG3's (S2000 spec) for my '04 RYP
I am debating if I should go with:

17x7.5 +48 (option 1)
Front:
17x8 +54 (option 2)


17x8.5 +51 (with option 1 front)
Rear:
17x9 +63 (with option 2 front)

As of right now my car is all stock with 25k on it. Not planning to mess with fender roll or anything like that.
Which option should I go with? Is the 17x9 a better looking vs the 17x8.5 considering the difference in offset?
Pictures appreciated, if any.
Thanks David
I have the 8@54 front and 9@63 rear plenty of pictures of my car for you to see. No rubbing issue. Ohlins 1” drop. Only thing I’d say is...it was tough fitting the spoon BBK. I had to go to a 13.8mm ballad sports rotor to get them to fit.
IG :
hanid33


Quick Reply: Advan RGIII



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.