245/17/40 in the front

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

10-10-2016 | 11:55 PM

#31

s2000Junky

Community Organizer

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 31,061

Likes: 556

Quote:

Originally Posted by wongs2k

My car is at stock height, and even at stock height with 255's on in the back the stock camber is very negatively aggressive, anyone notice that? I guess I'll wait until I put the coils in then pull the camber out with an alignment. You guys think I'll need adjustable LCA and toe arms?

Not particularly, unless the previous owner had some aggressive wheels on your car and cambered it out to fit. Stock from the factory is -1.5 ish in the rear and about half of that up front. If this is purely a freeway car to and from work, thats going to give you the most even tire wear. If you actually want to enjoy what the car has to offer on the weekends in the hills, your going to want a bit more negative camber, -2 to -2.25 in the rear and a similar spec up front. Tire wear will go up some, but so will performance handling and grip.

Reply Like

10-11-2016 | 07:11 AM

#32

RedCelica

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 15,345

Likes: 95

From: Raleigh

Quote:

Originally Posted by wongs2k

60 dollars for two wheels, honestly I would have paid anything he charged me after calling like 20 shops and no one would do it. What's wrong with these machine shops anyway, whatever happen to just helping someone out from the goodness of your heart? lol

My car is at stock height, and even at stock height with 255's on in the back the stock camber is very negatively aggressive, anyone notice that? I guess I'll wait until I put the coils in then pull the camber out with an alignment. You guys think I'll need adjustable LCA and toe arms?

No, but I think your next mod should DEFINITELY be a larger front sway to neutralize the handling.

Reply Like