Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

225's on Ap2's Front Wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-30-2006, 02:32 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Mark16q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Woodland Hills
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=IIGQ4U,Oct 30 2006, 02:44 PM]That is not a very aggressive alignment at all.
Old 10-30-2006, 04:59 PM
  #32  
Registered User

 
IIGQ4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: La Jolla, Ca
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Depends on what you are trying to do. If you are trying to be fast, you will want a more aggressive alignment. Is money a big issue?
Old 10-31-2006, 07:55 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Mark16q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Woodland Hills
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IIGQ4U,Oct 30 2006, 05:59 PM
Depends on what you are trying to do. If you are trying to be fast, you will want a more aggressive alignment. Is money a big issue?
Money isn't that big an "issue", but the car is leased so I don't plan on doing any suspension changes. But alignment, definitely willing to spend some money there to get the car handling.

I won't be auto-x'ing (don't think so anyways), but will be doing Willlow Springs, Button Willow, etc. So I will need some stability at higher speeds. Don't care if the track tires get beat up for the occassional street use, if it'll handle acceptably on the street and great on the track.

Mark
Old 10-31-2006, 11:30 AM
  #34  
Registered User

 
IIGQ4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: La Jolla, Ca
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are you planning to stay on street tires?

I would start with the UK alignment if I were you and get a feel for the car and proceed from there. You need to start with a base and the UK seems to be a pretty fair one to start.
Old 11-01-2006, 05:52 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
laguna2s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IIGQ4U,Oct 30 2006, 09:06 AM
The stagger should be greater than stock AP2 stagger. I was under the impression that the AP2 stagger is 215/245. We are speaking of a 215/255 which will increase understeer.
Yes, the sidewall #s OEM give you a stagger of 215/245, but the re050s in front are curiously narrow! If you look at the tread width #s, the re050s are essentially 205s, making the actual stagger more like 205/245 (the re050s in rear are average width) therefore a 215/255 setup in just about any other brand of tire will give you the same stagger as stock, Now on that note, in my experience, Ihave not yet tracked my06, but have gone on some hard rides, I have only had to correct for understeer, without a hint of oversteer (Honda has really dialed it out for 06). I was actually surprised after reading about the s2000s oversteer tendancies. If I had to make an adjustment right now, I would reduce the stagger and go a width wider in the front, or 215/245 stagger in a different brand.
Old 11-01-2006, 08:16 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Mark16q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Woodland Hills
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by laguna2s2k,Nov 1 2006, 06:52 PM
Yes, the sidewall #s OEM give you a stagger of 215/245, but the re050s in front are curiously narrow! If you look at the tread width #s, the re050s are essentially 205s, making the actual stagger more like 205/245 (the re050s in rear are average width) therefore a 215/255 setup in just about any other brand of tire will give you the same stagger as stock, Now on that note, in my experience, Ihave not yet tracked my06, but have gone on some hard rides, I have only had to correct for understeer, without a hint of oversteer (Honda has really dialed it out for 06). I was actually surprised after reading about the s2000s oversteer tendancies. If I had to make an adjustment right now, I would reduce the stagger and go a width wider in the front, or 215/245 stagger in a different brand.
Laguna,

Are you running stock alignment, or have you changed anything? Before my alignment, my '04 was a serious oversteerer. With the stockish alignment, slightly more camber on both ends, it is easily controlled oversteer. Whether goofing around on the street, or brisk canyon driving, the front end has never gone out on me.

Now that I've got a few more days on the 615's, I'm very happy with the balance and am getting more confident with the setup. Interestingly, they ride much better than the stock tires and handle expansion joints, etc much better. Didn't expect that. Also odd....despite numerous attempts to get the steering wheel centered by both the dealership and independent front end place, it never was perfect. Now it is! Simple pleasures.

As any everyday tire, these are better than stock. Rain may also be another story, but not much of an issue here in Socal. Thinking I'll probably leave these on 'til I return the car, and then throw the stock ones back on.

Mark
Old 11-01-2006, 08:20 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
[AP2-2NV]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by laguna2s2k,Nov 1 2006, 09:52 PM
Yes, the sidewall #s OEM give you a stagger of 215/245, but the re050s in front are curiously narrow! If you look at the tread width #s, the re050s are essentially 205s, making the actual stagger more like 205/245 (the re050s in rear are average width) therefore a 215/255 setup in just about any other brand of tire will give you the same stagger as stock, Now on that note, in my experience, Ihave not yet tracked my06, but have gone on some hard rides, I have only had to correct for understeer, without a hint of oversteer (Honda has really dialed it out for 06). I was actually surprised after reading about the s2000s oversteer tendancies. If I had to make an adjustment right now, I would reduce the stagger and go a width wider in the front, or 215/245 stagger in a different brand.
the 245re050 runs pretty wide too. 9" tread width, out of all the 255's i checked out, none of them had a 9" tread width. i looked at the 265's and they all had around 9.1-9.3.

so the 215 is more like a 205, and the 245 is more like a 260:lol:
Old 11-01-2006, 08:23 PM
  #38  
Registered User

 
IIGQ4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: La Jolla, Ca
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow! That's a big difference.
Old 11-02-2006, 07:08 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
laguna2s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark16q,Nov 1 2006, 09:16 PM
Laguna,

Are you running stock alignment, or have you changed anything? Before my alignment, my '04 was a serious oversteerer. With the stockish alignment, slightly more camber on both ends, it is easily controlled oversteer. Whether goofing around on the street, brisk canyon driving, or track, the front end has never gone out on me.

Now that I've got a few more days on the 615's, I'm very happy with the balance and am getting more confident with the setup. Interestingly, they ride much better than the stock tires and handle expansion joints, etc much better. Didn't expect that. Also odd....despite numerous attempts to get the steering wheel centered by both the dealership and independent front end place, it never was perfect. Now it is! Simple pleasures.

Putting aside track performance, as I don't know how that'll go, as any everyday tire, these are better than stock. Rain may also be another story, but not much of an issue here in Socal. Thinking I'll probably leave these on 'til I return the car, and then throw the stock ones back on.

Mark
2600K on my S, VooDoo shift knob is the only mod. Was there any other change to the sus. we dont know about between 04-06? I dont know. But on my last run W/some Del. Val. members the rear was rock solid, never even thought about it! The front pushed on the most demanding medium to low speed turns, not dramatic, but a bit of lift off was required to keep it on line. The front end has not "gone out" on me either, but so far, Ive felt more of a tendacy to understeer! Go figure!
Old 11-02-2006, 07:31 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
laguna2s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by [AP2-2NV
,Nov 1 2006, 09:20 PM] the 245re050 runs pretty wide too. 9" tread width, out of all the 255's i checked out, none of them had a 9" tread width. i looked at the 265's and they all had around 9.1-9.3.

so the 215 is more like a 205, and the 245 is more like a 260:lol:
Wow, I got to check that out, i always git the impression the rears were average. If that is the case, were talkin 205/ and a wide 255. Thats a lot! I think ppl. should know and take this into account when its time to put on a new set of rubber!


Quick Reply: 225's on Ap2's Front Wheels?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 AM.