16x8+20
01-26-2012 | 04:36 PM
#11
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: R.C.
I am running rpf1's in 16x7 f and 16x8 rear without issues - when I was running the 16x8 front too which ar +35 I had to dial in 3.5 degrees of camber and the tire still poked a bit with 225 tires. I can't imagine a 20 offset without full on flared fenders or just dumped on it's frame and a lot of camber.
I find the staggered sizes look better and the car is far less spin happy.
I find the staggered sizes look better and the car is far less spin happy.
01-27-2012 | 08:27 AM
#12
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
totally understand the logic behind "just cuz its cheap" but if it means i have to butcher my S to make it work then its not worth it. im not a stance whore by no means. i would just like to run something more aggressive for the winter.
how would maxybe 16x7 +45 f and 16x8+50r sound? judging by my very little knowledge of offset fitment i would say its high enough to clear my rolled rear fenders right?
how would maxybe 16x7 +45 f and 16x8+50r sound? judging by my very little knowledge of offset fitment i would say its high enough to clear my rolled rear fenders right?
01-27-2012 | 09:09 AM
#13
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
16x8+20 on stock fenders your gonna have to run a pretty skinny tire and do a good amount of pulling like what others have said.
Im running 17x9 +20 in the back with 255 tires but I have cut quarter panels and 30mm overfenders.
Im running 17x9 +20 in the back with 255 tires but I have cut quarter panels and 30mm overfenders.
01-27-2012 | 11:53 AM
#14
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield County
hmm, guess im definitely not going that route lol, i love the look of over fenders but i too chicken to make the jump
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post