Mark this thread as Sold
FS: Canon EF lenses
#1
FS: Canon EF lenses
Got two lenses I have up for sale;
Canon EF 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM
and;
Canon 20-35/3.5-4.5 EF USM
Both are in good condition although the 20-35 has some fine scratches on the lens coating, thease do not affect the image quality. Come on guys some good add ons for your digicams that will last longer than your camera!
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...AMESE%3AIT&rd=1
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...AMESE%3AIT&rd=1
Canon EF 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM
and;
Canon 20-35/3.5-4.5 EF USM
Both are in good condition although the 20-35 has some fine scratches on the lens coating, thease do not affect the image quality. Come on guys some good add ons for your digicams that will last longer than your camera!
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...AMESE%3AIT&rd=1
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...AMESE%3AIT&rd=1
#2
#3
I'll keep that in mind Ian, too many pixel counters for me though, which is where most forums are going. I'm Lurking more in www.apug.org though where I'm honing my skills for achieving an ARPS
#5
Originally Posted by GSi,Jan 17 2006, 12:39 AM
If there had been a 10-20 in there I'd have been interested
Have you looked at the Canon mount Sigma 10-20mm Rob? Seems good value compared to the Canon version, pretty good reviews as well.
Trending Topics
#8
I can see you're a badge snob Lee, I've heard a lot of good things about the Sigma 10-20 - from professionals. I've also seen some cracking images.
My sensor is smaller than I'd like it is true, but said professionals use the 10-20 on the 1DsMk2 and have no issues at the edges. I'll probably upgrade my lens before the body though, so 10-20 is probably what I'll afford/choose.
I have a couple of Sigma lenses 17-35 EX f2.8-4.0 and 80-400 OS EX and I'm very happy with them for the sort of things I do. But I had the 17-35 when I had a film SLR so am hankering for the extra width in my shots.. If I could afford it I'd go for the 16-35? Canon lens and the 1DsMk2
My sensor is smaller than I'd like it is true, but said professionals use the 10-20 on the 1DsMk2 and have no issues at the edges. I'll probably upgrade my lens before the body though, so 10-20 is probably what I'll afford/choose.
I have a couple of Sigma lenses 17-35 EX f2.8-4.0 and 80-400 OS EX and I'm very happy with them for the sort of things I do. But I had the 17-35 when I had a film SLR so am hankering for the extra width in my shots.. If I could afford it I'd go for the 16-35? Canon lens and the 1DsMk2
#9
Originally Posted by GSi,Jan 17 2006, 09:19 AM
I can see you're a badge snob Lee,
For bokeh and tone, Canon suits me better