Floppy

does this happen a lot then? I know you are pretty low and run low offsets too so what sort of size wheel would you advise, staggered or non-staggered?


et50? What have you gone for?


well I've seen a friends car with a staggered setup thats about et38 and that looks good IMO but I suppose its each to their own...

rob2.2

18 x 8.5j et48 all round on my s2k and it looks good,
ive just fitted 3mm spacers on the back so effectively a et45 on the back

if you go alot lower with some nice camber you could go more agressive on your et with a 35

TommyS2000

Stop being a gay and just do it! Non staggered felt better to me when I was repping the Enkeis and they were 8.5" +30. Archwork is simple when left to the pros. Your car will look awsome and I promise you will not regret it!

Floppy

I'm not being gay you douchebag, I'm just doing my homework first so I know everything that needs to be done, pro's and con's as well as costs before I do it!

TommyS2000

zzzzzzzzzzzz old git!
Your inspiration is to go and look how your wheels recess into your arches!

r8byb

non staggered is beneficial due to the 50/50 weight distribution. You also gain front end grip and IMO a better balance.

Dembo

Though it must make the steering heavier, make tramlining worse, make aquaplaning worse, and lose steering feel generally.

Floppy

The weight of the steering is too light anyway even with the castor maxed out in my opinion and I don't really understand how you'd say that you would lose steering feel if there is more grip?

With you on tram lining and aquaplaning though but I doubt tram lining much worse than OEM 17's as Tommy's doesnt seem to wander any more than mine.

r8byb

Spykee I run 235s up front, steering feel and grip are vastly improved over 215s

tramlining no worse either.

whaninoz

you can do that when lowered on standard 16" wheels.....i know this for sure

I will be rolling hte little dink out when i have a free afternoon.