Supra guys comments..
#23
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My mate is into his Soops .. I drove his UK spec (Twin Turbo) and it was damn rapid, but I had almost no feedback through the controls. The Auto on them is loverly and the car just wants to pull and pull through the rev range.
But I prefered my MR2 turbo, it was smaller, more point and squirt and I was quicker round the 'ring (but that could be a lot down to the driver).
When I decided on a new car, I didn't want skyline/supra etc .. too damn big and lardy.
He's just sold the UK one and got a manual Jap spec to strip it and slap a 2.2 MR2 lump into it (about 500bhp) to make it more like the S2k with the engine behind the front wheels. Can't wait to take that out for a spin.
But I prefered my MR2 turbo, it was smaller, more point and squirt and I was quicker round the 'ring (but that could be a lot down to the driver).
When I decided on a new car, I didn't want skyline/supra etc .. too damn big and lardy.
He's just sold the UK one and got a manual Jap spec to strip it and slap a 2.2 MR2 lump into it (about 500bhp) to make it more like the S2k with the engine behind the front wheels. Can't wait to take that out for a spin.
#24
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ...by a lake...somewhere
Posts: 29,526
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
I nearly bought a 25k Supra many years ago. Thank god I didn`t. It'd be worth pennies now
But they are bloody rapid. Its plagued like the old Celica was. It felt like a 'normal' car to control ie no real feedback or solidity to it.
Saying that though, when I see them, if not completely chavved, I always like the look of them.
Thing with the S, if the bloke had kept it, he could've sold it and bought 4 or 5 Supras.
But they are bloody rapid. Its plagued like the old Celica was. It felt like a 'normal' car to control ie no real feedback or solidity to it.
Saying that though, when I see them, if not completely chavved, I always like the look of them.
Thing with the S, if the bloke had kept it, he could've sold it and bought 4 or 5 Supras.
#25
Originally Posted by Shipley,Jul 28 2005, 05:26 PM
I had to come away from that forum as I didn't have the false hairy chest and medallion.
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The guy who started the thread sounds like a spoon:
Funny that almost every motoring press calls the s2000 one of the best value .performance cars.
And now we're back to the line "I'm a shit driver but I'll blame the car".
See above
Have to agree, but didn't he notice this before he bought it?
Two words: Dash Controls
Yeah that's terrible
His only genuine point.
Errr don't be a dumbass and press it then?
for the cost of the car I found it very lacking...
I found the car to be very twitchy even at low speed...
1. Twitches badly, not even good for drifitng, while you can get it step out nicely, it fishtails when you bring it back in again
2. Very small inside, and this is coming for someone small like me
3. Radio access is ACROSS the gear level
4. Very low power, supposed 240bhp
5. Steering wheel doesn't adjust
6. Engine start button activates the starter even when the engine is running
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And a quote from another poster:
LMAO
But this one might just take the biscuit:
S2000 blend in? He's living in a dream world. You'll probably see a Supra on the road everyday, and no one pays any attention to them. I could probably count the number of S2000's I've seen on both hands. I've driven some decent cras in my time but none attract attention like the S.
not driven one but heard you've really gotta rag the nuts off it to make it feel even slightly fast. poser's car IMO
But this one might just take the biscuit:
Not to mention that when you drive an S2000, you just blend in with the rest of the crowd in their RX8's, MX5's, Z3's/4's, Audi TT's etc. etc.
We hardly got a look, unlike when you're driving a Supra. For a "posers' car", it really ain't much good for posing in!!!
We hardly got a look, unlike when you're driving a Supra. For a "posers' car", it really ain't much good for posing in!!!
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supra is a nice looking car, and I love torque and turbo's, but lots of ths points are daft - especially the twitchy thing - that's just not being smooth or subtle enough with the aids.
#29
You'll never win the clowns over. They like big ham-fisted chav mobile's, and we like engineering and handling purity.
Each thinks their own is the only way forward. Let the chavs have their fun and leave them to it.
Each thinks their own is the only way forward. Let the chavs have their fun and leave them to it.