View Poll Results: An S2000 without a front lip is as girly as an MX5 - discuss
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll
An S2000 without a front lip is as girly as an MX5 - discuss
02-23-2004, 12:40 PM
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Do You have a HoNda?
Posts: 8,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without lip - looks cool. The front end looks rounded but still good.
With lip - looks intimidating. More purposeful poise, mean and makes the car seem wider.
With lip - looks intimidating. More purposeful poise, mean and makes the car seem wider.
02-23-2004, 02:30 PM
#42
Banned
Can't decide and I like sitting on the fence. 
Seriously, both look good. I think I prefer without and it might be something to do with the lip fixing.
But then I don't have a lip and I know I would probably feel different if I did.
One thing, I do hope the external mods don't go too far. Nightmare vision of Max Power stuffed with S2000s in 2007........
Seriously, both look good. I think I prefer without and it might be something to do with the lip fixing.
But then I don't have a lip and I know I would probably feel different if I did.
One thing, I do hope the external mods don't go too far. Nightmare vision of Max Power stuffed with S2000s in 2007........
with everything Gaddafi has just said.
02-24-2004, 12:19 AM
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ianl
The OEM calipers on the S2000 are not the most beautiful to grace gods earth - they are perfectly functional, but for heavens sake, why attract attention to them????????
The OEM calipers on the S2000 are not the most beautiful to grace gods earth - they are perfectly functional, but for heavens sake, why attract attention to them????????
02-24-2004, 03:51 AM
#47
Registered User
I enquired whether the lip/spoiler/skirts offered any aerodynamic advantage and was told they were purely cosmetic items.
The car looks great as is IMO so I decided not to add the extra weight/drag, as I would much rather have a fast S than a tarted up one.
Besides that you cant see them from the drivers seat so who cares what they look like?
The car looks great as is IMO so I decided not to add the extra weight/drag, as I would much rather have a fast S than a tarted up one.
Besides that you cant see them from the drivers seat so who cares what they look like?
02-24-2004, 03:59 AM
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But you would see it almost everytime you walk back to your car (or if you're as sad as me, everytime you walk away from your car and look back over your shoulder.... sigh.... and think it's bloody filthy, I really must wash it this weekend 
)
)
02-24-2004, 04:04 AM
#50
Originally posted by sportyking
I enquired whether the lip/spoiler/skirts offered any aerodynamic advantage and was told they were purely cosmetic items.
The car looks great as is IMO so I decided not to add the extra weight/drag, as I would much rather have a fast S than a tarted up one.
I enquired whether the lip/spoiler/skirts offered any aerodynamic advantage and was told they were purely cosmetic items.
The car looks great as is IMO so I decided not to add the extra weight/drag, as I would much rather have a fast S than a tarted up one.
If it does nothing, what actually is the point? (Rhetorical).
Only one answer: Rice!
Next stop will be a Civic 1.4 with a Vileside body kit. It's a slippery slope.