S2000 Type-R
#33
Originally Posted by cheshire_carper,Jan 26 2007, 11:25 PM
I could tell when I swapped HKS to Amuse - it was a better pull.
I could also tell when the tank was full.
I could also tell when the tank was full.
Could you also tell when you'd had a rather big dump?
#34
Originally Posted by gaddafi,Jan 26 2007, 11:37 PM
it will be a run-out rip off, if it happens at all
(The naming convention will be interesting. We've had S500, S600, S800, S2000.
Logic might suggest S1000 ?)
#35
Honda have had several S1000 designs over the years - one was a four-cylinder version of the V8 S2000 apparently!
I suspect they'll keep the "S2000" moniker (& probably the tub & suspension, given the closeness in dimensions) for the new car.
Like Bada say, it then makes perfect sense to slide in an "S3500" between that & the ASC. I say S3500, because HSC looked fully production-engineered to me!
I suspect they'll keep the "S2000" moniker (& probably the tub & suspension, given the closeness in dimensions) for the new car.
Like Bada say, it then makes perfect sense to slide in an "S3500" between that & the ASC. I say S3500, because HSC looked fully production-engineered to me!
#36
Originally Posted by NNervous_R,Jan 27 2007, 09:27 AM
The run out positioning of the S2000 will be a definite consideration. Such a product as an R type would help in attempt to position the S2000 as a, "harder" different product to the "softer" replacement, if it isndeed as speculated.
(The naming convention will be interesting. We've had S500, S600, S800, S2000.
Logic might suggest S1000 ?)
(The naming convention will be interesting. We've had S500, S600, S800, S2000.
Logic might suggest S1000 ?)
even if the parts are nice
M3 CS is a good example
but unfortunately
Honda don't have any higher spec S2000 bits lying around
and I don't think the NSX leftovers will fit
#38
I remember reading (don't know where) that 5kg was about the equivilent of 1bhp (in acceleration, in cornering and breaking, less is more).
So a 100Kg loss would be good.
Why arn't the USDM and JDM cars known as the S2200 now?
I'd heard mutterings about a CRX replacement like the S2000, B16 lump and S1600 would be a good MX5 alternative.
The car defo needed more poke as the Z4 and Boxter have moved further and further away in performance terms. But how can Honda keep up only using a 4 pot and no FI ?
So a 100Kg loss would be good.
Why arn't the USDM and JDM cars known as the S2200 now?
I'd heard mutterings about a CRX replacement like the S2000, B16 lump and S1600 would be a good MX5 alternative.
The car defo needed more poke as the Z4 and Boxter have moved further and further away in performance terms. But how can Honda keep up only using a 4 pot and no FI ?
#39
Originally Posted by Bibbs,Jan 27 2007, 02:48 PM
The car defo needed more poke as the Z4 and Boxter have moved further and further away in performance terms. But how can Honda keep up only using a 4 pot and no FI ?
certainly wasn't the case in the notorious Top Gear wet test