UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

Righto, I'm changing to F1s :mad:

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-20-2004, 04:50 AM
  #21  

Thread Starter
 
Chris Type R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Herts
Posts: 20,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Nick Graves
Chris,

Would you please elaborate on that acceleration bit?
With the 16s on, acceleration seems to be down compared to the 18s, which are marginally lighter. This is a seat of pants feeling on my daily route.
Old 04-20-2004, 05:06 AM
  #22  

 
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hertford
Posts: 31,183
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Ah,

That's a bit counter-intuitive, as I thought.

I would have expected the overall rolling radius of the 18" to be greater, hence the car would be fractionally higher geared.

As you say, possibly the heavier wheels/tyres increases driveline inertia, resulting in a more sluggish feel.

I know what you meant about tyres feeling heavy. The MX-5s felt like they had walking boots on, if the incorrect tyres were fitted.
Old 04-20-2004, 05:23 AM
  #23  

 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wakefield, West Yorks.
Posts: 17,570
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Nick Graves
Ah,

That's a bit counter-intuitive, as I thought.

I would have expected the overall rolling radius of the 18" to be greater, hence the car would be fractionally higher geared.
Not if you use the correct tyres. My first set was 2mm less diameter. The new set (255s) I think was 5mm more. Not now they are a bit warn of course.
Old 04-20-2004, 05:28 AM
  #24  

 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wakefield, West Yorks.
Posts: 17,570
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually that was a complete lie.
I've just checked again, and it was 1.8mm MORE, now its 8.8mm more.

Which of course is a rolling radius of +0.9mm , and + 4.4mm.
Old 04-20-2004, 05:29 AM
  #25  
GSi
Registered User
 
GSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5mm x 3.14 = 15.75mm around the edge then

Can someone turn that into a difference in MPH? I struggled to rememeber Pi x D
Old 04-20-2004, 05:29 AM
  #26  
GSi
Registered User
 
GSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Fletch
Actually that was a complete lie.
I've just checked again, and it was 1.8mm MORE, now its 8.8mm more.
Crikey thats a massive 27.632mm extra around the edge.
Old 04-20-2004, 05:35 AM
  #27  

 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wakefield, West Yorks.
Posts: 17,570
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, that was in dia. -- 4.4mm radius.


Whats the sizes of the tyres GSI?
i.e.
Stock 245/45/16 = Radius 313.5mm
New 255/35/18 = Radius 317.9mm
which is 1.4% slower so speedo read 100 I'm doing 101.4
Old 04-20-2004, 05:37 AM
  #28  

 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wakefield, West Yorks.
Posts: 17,570
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.shell.net.nz/dev/tyrecalc/
Old 04-20-2004, 05:43 AM
  #29  

 
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hertford
Posts: 31,183
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

That's fun, Fletch!

Now I can safely bugger up lots of fine-handling cars!
Old 04-20-2004, 05:57 AM
  #30  

 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wakefield, West Yorks.
Posts: 17,570
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



Quick Reply: Righto, I'm changing to F1s :mad:



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM.