Low cost, high performance cars
06-04-2003, 03:54 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edenbridge
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Low cost, high performance cars
Just thought you might like to see the latest headline news on MSN. What a joke!
http://cars.msn.co.uk/carnews/toppremiumperformers/
Gotta get me a Volvo.....not.
Del.
http://cars.msn.co.uk/carnews/toppremiumperformers/
Gotta get me a Volvo.....not.
Del.
06-04-2003, 06:06 AM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Forest
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To quote, "Who needs an M3 anyway?", "How much more performance could you need or want?".
If I had a choice between a 163BHP 1.8T A4 and and 344BHP S4, I'd take the S4 thankyou.
Clearly not a driving enthusiast. Probably written by a Bi-Fuel Volvo driver.
If I had a choice between a 163BHP 1.8T A4 and and 344BHP S4, I'd take the S4 thankyou.
Clearly not a driving enthusiast. Probably written by a Bi-Fuel Volvo driver.
06-04-2003, 06:38 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's wrong with bi-fuel Volvos??? I think they're highly responsible vehicles and much under-rated. Why, just think of the benefits to the WHOLE WORLD if S2000 could be had in bi-fuel formats. I only bought mine because it was an Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle (ULEV) in the USA. Do you know there are some trees in my neck of the woods which haven't been hugged in 20 years!!!! How would you feel if that was you hmmmm???
.
.
.
oooooo must lie down I'm feeling a bit funny
... that's better. Eat 
volvo 
.
.
.
oooooo must lie down I'm feeling a bit funny
... that's better. Eat volvo
nuff said
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dyhppy
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
128
03-15-2006 09:16 PM