Like Pulp Fiction - what you call a moral dilemma
12-13-2004, 05:47 AM
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hire / borrow a car of same make and colour as his.
Get a copy of his number plate made up and attach to hired vehicle.
Drive through an active speed camera at over twice the speed limit.
Watch him sell his car 2 month later after he has no license.
This obviously means breaking the law twice, so I don't suggest the above, etc etc etc ;-)
Get a copy of his number plate made up and attach to hired vehicle.
Drive through an active speed camera at over twice the speed limit.
Watch him sell his car 2 month later after he has no license.
This obviously means breaking the law twice, so I don't suggest the above, etc etc etc ;-)
12-13-2004, 05:49 AM
#53
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Richieh,Dec 13 2004, 02:35 PM
1. Don't stereotype, and remember that simple doesn't mean wrong. I presume the intelligence point referred to my typo in "anonymous"
2. I read your earlier posts, so the answer of what you should do seems obvious.
2. I read your earlier posts, so the answer of what you should do seems obvious.
Simple may not be wrong, but it can certainly be not bright enough to expect a response.
Ever thought why stereotypes exist?
The intelligence point had nothing to do with spelling. I've explained it above.
As for 2. as in my response to TimD, it's your opinion that my next action should be obvious.
I welcome the opinions, because I asked for them.
Accepting them is not the same thing.
12-13-2004, 05:50 AM
#54
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by RichT2000,Dec 13 2004, 02:47 PM
Hire / borrow a car of same make and colour as his.
Get a copy of his number plate made up and attach to hired vehicle.
Drive through an active speed camera at over twice the speed limit.
Watch him sell his car 2 month later after he has no license.
This obviously means breaking the law twice, so I don't suggest the above, etc etc etc ;-)
Get a copy of his number plate made up and attach to hired vehicle.
Drive through an active speed camera at over twice the speed limit.
Watch him sell his car 2 month later after he has no license.
This obviously means breaking the law twice, so I don't suggest the above, etc etc etc ;-)
12-13-2004, 05:55 AM
#55
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RichT2000,Dec 13 2004, 02:47 PM
Hire / borrow a car of same make and colour as his.
Get a copy of his number plate made up and attach to hired vehicle.
Drive through an active speed camera at over twice the speed limit.
Watch him sell his car 2 month later after he has no license.
This obviously means breaking the law twice, so I don't suggest the above, etc etc etc ;-)
Get a copy of his number plate made up and attach to hired vehicle.
Drive through an active speed camera at over twice the speed limit.
Watch him sell his car 2 month later after he has no license.
This obviously means breaking the law twice, so I don't suggest the above, etc etc etc ;-)
) it may help conviction if he contests!
12-13-2004, 06:01 AM
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gaddafi,Dec 13 2004, 02:49 PM
You make a judgemental and snidey dig.
Simple may not be wrong, but it can certainly be not bright enough to expect a response.
Ever thought why stereotypes exist?
The intelligence point had nothing to do with spelling. I've explained it above.
As for 2. as in my response to TimD, it's your opinion that my next action should be obvious.
I welcome the opinions, because I asked for them.
Accepting them is not the same thing.
Simple may not be wrong, but it can certainly be not bright enough to expect a response.
Ever thought why stereotypes exist?
The intelligence point had nothing to do with spelling. I've explained it above.
As for 2. as in my response to TimD, it's your opinion that my next action should be obvious.
I welcome the opinions, because I asked for them.
Accepting them is not the same thing.
Stereotypes exist due to laziness and an unwilligness to consider individual cases on their own merits. We all knew that.
On a serious note, what are you looking from (the cut-up driver, not responding to my posts! ) and why?
12-13-2004, 06:03 AM
#57
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Yorks
Posts: 10,979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A question.
Is this to 'teach them a lesson' or is this purely to extract some satisfaction for their misdemeanour?
The answer dictates the course of action suggested.
Is this to 'teach them a lesson' or is this purely to extract some satisfaction for their misdemeanour?
The answer dictates the course of action suggested.
can go steaming in guns blazing.....the clever ones make sure the target never saw what hit them. I think this is where Gad is coming from
12-13-2004, 06:24 AM
#60
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richieh,Dec 13 2004, 03:20 PM
"Face to face" doesn't mean "Steaming in, guns blazing" Zero. I don't think anybody has suggested steaming in, guns blazing.