James May's just bought a Boxster!
07-18-2005, 10:09 AM
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Aintree near Liverpool
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the end you tend to buy what you can afford, whether it's a 4x4, luxury cruiser, drop-top or coupe. The guy who buys an MX5 would probably love a Boxster or Z4, he wants a car that drives well and so he goes for the car he can afford.
IMHO the S2000 is the best trade off for looks, performance, reliability, running costs and affordability out of all the 20K+ roadsters/drop tops out there. A Boxster S with extras is gonna cost you 40K? 14K more than the S. That's a lot of money!
IMHO the S2000 is the best trade off for looks, performance, reliability, running costs and affordability out of all the 20K+ roadsters/drop tops out there. A Boxster S with extras is gonna cost you 40K? 14K more than the S. That's a lot of money!
07-18-2005, 10:14 AM
#52
Banned
Originally Posted by salty,Jul 18 2005, 06:09 PM
1. In the end you tend to buy what you can afford, whether it's a 4x4, luxury cruiser, drop-top or coupe. The guy who buys an MX5 would probably love a Boxster or Z4, he wants a car that drives well and so he goes for the car he can afford.
2. IMHO the S2000 is the best trade off for looks, performance, reliability, running costs and affordability out of all the 20K+ roadsters/drop tops out there. A Boxster S with extras is gonna cost you 40K? 14K more than the S. That's a lot of money!
2. IMHO the S2000 is the best trade off for looks, performance, reliability, running costs and affordability out of all the 20K+ roadsters/drop tops out there. A Boxster S with extras is gonna cost you 40K? 14K more than the S. That's a lot of money!
2. Completely agree.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post