Information for 09 owners
#271
Do you have to pick an argument with everything ?
Not in the same way as bearings which are shaped to be load bearing. Thrust washers cannot take much load (in comparison)
If you want to argue then start another thread in car talk to save spamming this one
Edit; fester, that is aimed at lower, not you
Not in the same way as bearings which are shaped to be load bearing. Thrust washers cannot take much load (in comparison)
If you want to argue then start another thread in car talk to save spamming this one
Edit; fester, that is aimed at lower, not you
If there is an issue with the thrust washers wearing prematurely, as i said earlier in the thread, its likely that the thrust washers are defective in some way or there is a machining issue with the block or crank that means that they are taking more load than they should.
#273
#274
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: On another planet
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Warranty is not worth a carrot if replacement engines are defective and there are a few people who have experienced that
If this is not sorted soon (read as imminently) I have a plan
It will not be pretty but I will make my point and it will be difficult (impossible) for Honda to ignore
As far as I am concerned they have had enough time to sort this
PS Anyone waiting for the diagnosis of Bokkie's car may be disappointed. It may be an altogether different issue. eggs/ one basket= daft
If this is not sorted soon (read as imminently) I have a plan
It will not be pretty but I will make my point and it will be difficult (impossible) for Honda to ignore
As far as I am concerned they have had enough time to sort this
PS Anyone waiting for the diagnosis of Bokkie's car may be disappointed. It may be an altogether different issue. eggs/ one basket= daft
#276
Reading above... Honda UK are focusing their energies on "b" and not "a" where....
a/ Rattling issue
b/ Newly discovered metal on metal noise issue
As "a" has been a concern for 2+ years with a number of owners affected - shouldn't this be their priority?
or has the newly discovered "b" Top Trumped "a".
and if so - Why?
what is HUK's clear statement on "a" ?
Or is Bundle of Mayhem and everyone else up shit creek?
a/ Rattling issue
b/ Newly discovered metal on metal noise issue
As "a" has been a concern for 2+ years with a number of owners affected - shouldn't this be their priority?
or has the newly discovered "b" Top Trumped "a".
and if so - Why?
what is HUK's clear statement on "a" ?
Or is Bundle of Mayhem and everyone else up shit creek?
#277
#278
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: On another planet
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reading above... Honda UK are focusing their energies on "b" and not "a" where....
a/ Rattling issue
b/ Newly discovered metal on metal noise issue
As "a" has been a concern for 2+ years with a number of owners affected - shouldn't this be their priority?
or has the newly discovered "b" Top Trumped "a".
and if so - Why?
what is HUK's clear statement on "a" ?
Or is Bundle of Mayhem and everyone else up shit creek?
a/ Rattling issue
b/ Newly discovered metal on metal noise issue
As "a" has been a concern for 2+ years with a number of owners affected - shouldn't this be their priority?
or has the newly discovered "b" Top Trumped "a".
and if so - Why?
what is HUK's clear statement on "a" ?
Or is Bundle of Mayhem and everyone else up shit creek?
Does that help anyone else ? Not necessarily. It sounds like it may be a different issue.
Honda's stance concerning the rattle, to my knowledge, has not changed. If the crank is borderline tolerance fit new thrust washers. This "fix" does not work according to owners who have reported back on the forum. The fact that HUK recommend this is a big clue as to what is actually wrong with the engines though.
If you have "the noise" you will likely be told "it is a characteristic of the vehicle". Which is laughable in my opinion. I have listened to some of the affected cars and it is obvious something is wrong.
So, NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
Legal action is fine BUT owners will most likely have to employ a respected and well known engineer diagnose the issue. A back street garage will not suffice and neither will opinions. Lawyers deal with facts, not speculation. And experts cost money, legal or otherwise.
All of this takes time
Maybe a more direct approach is needed
#279
Reading above... Honda UK are focusing their energies on "b" and not "a" where....
a/ Rattling issue
b/ Newly discovered metal on metal noise issue
As "a" has been a concern for 2+ years with a number of owners affected - shouldn't this be their priority?
or has the newly discovered "b" Top Trumped "a".
and if so - Why?
what is HUK's clear statement on "a" ?
Or is Bundle of Mayhem and everyone else up shit creek?
a/ Rattling issue
b/ Newly discovered metal on metal noise issue
As "a" has been a concern for 2+ years with a number of owners affected - shouldn't this be their priority?
or has the newly discovered "b" Top Trumped "a".
and if so - Why?
what is HUK's clear statement on "a" ?
Or is Bundle of Mayhem and everyone else up shit creek?
Bokkie's car has already had a considerable amount of work carried out to various components and is now exibiting a new and different noise.
There have been so many changes to Bokkie's car since manufacture that this will hamper Honda's ability to diagnose the root cause of problem.