UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

How problematic is it to only use 95 Octane?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-09-2004, 11:53 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
MunkeyBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mdjohnso,Dec 9 2004, 09:31 PM
my ex's S2K was run on nothing but 95 fuel and it was every bit as quick and
reliable as mine which is run on Optimax....
The performance benefit of using Optimax is similar to that of cleaning your car IMHO i.e. physcological. The S always feel more "together" after a damn good wash and polish, much the same as the "feeling" that the S seems to respond better as you pull away from the Shell forecourt.

I use Opti mainly because A: it's one of the highest octanes avalible (BP stuff is 97 and often more expensive) B: a shell garage is the closest to home and C: because it seems to have a higher mix of detergents.

Oh and i get double shell points equating to around
Old 12-09-2004, 11:57 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Finesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AquilaEagle
Where do you live?!
In a vllage in West Essex

GTFCTIM
[QUOTE]
Surely a 20 mile drive to get some optimax is a good excuse for a 'pointless' drive!
Old 12-10-2004, 12:05 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
mariawhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: hampshire
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I use 95 cos I have a petrol card and get my wrists slapped very hard if I try to use 98.. I have had no problems, but the car does behave very dfferently on those occasions where the garage is out of stock of 95 and I have to put 98 in!
Old 12-10-2004, 12:28 AM
  #14  
GSi
Registered User
 
GSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Never really noticed the few times I put 95 in mine, certainly wasn't as bad as some guys on here seen to have experienced
Old 12-10-2004, 05:51 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Edlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

U lucky u can even get 95 octane. I live in Jhb (Johannesburg) and they only have 93 petrol here! When i drive to the coast (Cape Town or Durban) I use the 97 thats available. Combined with the high altitude in Jhb, the net effect of poor petrol and air is a 17% decrease in power.

There are no mods to the SA S2000's coz of the petrol so there shoudnt be engine damage. The Subarus that usually make 208KW (280BHP) have to be detuned slightly to run on the sh!t for fuel we have here.
Old 01-22-2005, 08:23 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
LOADESMOORE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I tried 95 for the first few weeks of ownership and when I changed to 97 then 98 I found that just the 97 produced the most amazing improvement in smoothness, pick up and power. I cannot detect any difference between 97 and Optimax. However, when I tried 95 again for a long motorway run and we had to stop/start in a queue the engine started cutting out! No trouble since we went back to Sainsbury's 97.

I also noticed that EVO or some similat mag has a long termer and the driver reported exactly the above symptoms running on 95.

David
Old 01-22-2005, 08:48 AM
  #17  

 
ade73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hell on toast
Posts: 5,109
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Read this thread, think brian and myself explain it pretty much.

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...56935&hl=octane
Old 01-22-2005, 08:52 AM
  #18  
Registered User

 
JamieS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 11,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Finesse,Dec 10 2004, 08:57 AM
AquilaEagle


In a vllage in West Essex

GTFCTIM


I'm all for a good excuse for a 20 mile drive around our villages, I just trying to get a feel for how important Optimax really is in terms of extra perfomance and better long term care versus aditional cost and spending unnecessary time seeking it out.



Finesse
Where in Essex , I live there ? I always use optimax or BP ultimate , couldnt risk losing that few bhp
Old 01-22-2005, 09:46 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
jmd2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fairwater, Cardiff
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm on my second tank of optimax, and still think it produces less mpg, than Sainsbury's 97, but is better in stop/start traffic. I haven't decided yet what my long term choice will be. (Although Sainsbury's is closer to home and less of a fag to get in and out of that the Shell station at the bottom of the M32, closer to work)
Old 01-22-2005, 10:48 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
eyeofthetiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rochdale Lancs
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was going to start a thread on this topic myself but decided against it as I thought I would get "read the technical FAQ thread" X100 comments(I have by the way

Last week when I went to my shell garage my intention was to fill up with optimax, I got to the pump 87.9p vs 78.9p premium unleaded. To me 4-5p is nothing but 9p is quite a difference and I eventually decided to fill with unleaded.

My question is to owners who have used both fuels in a short period of time...Is there a NOTICEABLE difference in smoothness/performance or do you feel the differences described are a placebo effect?


Quick Reply: How problematic is it to only use 95 Octane?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 PM.