UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

German Blown apart

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-30-2008, 02:08 PM
  #31  
J_D
Registered User
 
J_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Told you, power to weight is the key, thats why I now have a single pipe, and no spare wheel and now weights roughley 1225kg over 1250kg which now means I now have 202bhp per ton as apose to 196bhp per ton. (this worked out with a 7hp increase in power from the exhaust)

Pays to do you research, now looking in to more weight saving and power gaining.
Old 09-30-2008, 02:10 PM
  #32  
Registered User

 
RedUn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North West
Posts: 2,699
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by moff,Sep 30 2008, 10:39 PM
Always depends on who is chasing and who is leading.

In my S2000 I had a Z3M Coupe walk away from me as if I was standing... from about 50mph to 'higher' speeds.

Not the lardy weight of an M3 cab, but not that far away in performance.

I would agree that the M3 cab is probably about 1-1.5 secs slower than the coupe to 100mph, so the difference on the road is never going to be huge.
The tests were side by side.

Never had chance to play with a Z3M

At the end of the day it's bloody pointless anyway I was just pointing out that there was never as much difference as people seem to think

Rick
Old 09-30-2008, 02:12 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,755
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J_D,Sep 30 2008, 10:08 PM

Pays to do you research, now looking in to more weight saving and power gaining.
it has all been done before

volumes of info on here


Old 09-30-2008, 02:18 PM
  #34  
Registered User

 
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frustration
Posts: 12,330
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blurter,Sep 30 2008, 09:02 PM


Interesting, but really WGAF


However, I prefer the noise of the 3.2 6 to the F20C 4

I have a reall passion for sixes and that, along with the C32A, is a noise I would happily slow down for
Old 09-30-2008, 09:51 PM
  #35  
Registered User

 
kitkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: kent
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its about a car length to a 120 leptons difference with a stock m3 coupe once you have a supa dupa charger - of course if theyve had a FI upgrade to some boost your stuffed
Old 09-30-2008, 11:43 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
phils2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: south east
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had no problem pulling away from an m3 the other week.

but from experience with stock vs m3 the m3 was better straight line

ps db9,911 gt, and bentley continental all very slow compared to the S.
Old 10-01-2008, 01:38 AM
  #37  

 
Nottm_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 22,711
Received 654 Likes on 569 Posts
Default


the E46 IS going to pull a gap at higher speeds, but it's a heavy car so only has about 210 bhp/tonne hence the early accell won't be that much different (the convertible is about 100kg heavier on the old M3 i think).

i encountered one at Donington, trust me, i am no Senna but I kept up with it. The 1/4 mile is about 13.5s.. round that track (short + twisty) i would reckon on the S being quicker with the same driver but not by much, that extra half a tonne is just too much for the twisties and it was never a great car

0-100 times are about 2s apart though so on a track with more straights/higher speeds the M3 would be very comfortably in front
Old 10-01-2008, 01:39 AM
  #38  

 
Nottm_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 22,711
Received 654 Likes on 569 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phils2k,Oct 1 2008, 07:43 AM
ps db9,911 gt, and bentley continental all very slow compared to MY S.
very likely
Old 10-01-2008, 01:58 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
GREGSTERWIZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: On another planet
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phils2k,Sep 30 2008, 11:43 PM
I had no problem pulling away from an m3 the other week.

but from experience with stock vs m3 the m3 was better straight line

ps db9,911 gt, and bentley continental all very slow compared to the S.
Modified cars are all very well and good.

If that is your thing.

I recently saw many examples of fast road cars (911, M3, M5,etc.) being pounded around Donington by modified 80's RS Fords.

But I know which cars I would rather own.

They are usually built in either Munich or Stuttgart
Old 10-01-2008, 02:15 AM
  #40  

 
Nottm_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 22,711
Received 654 Likes on 569 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GREGSTERWIZ,Oct 1 2008, 09:58 AM
They are usually built in either Munich or Stuttgart
not Maranello or San't Agata then? I like porkers but not so keen on BMs, they make great fast saloons (which aren't really my bag) and a 2 seater which looks awful and i can never get past that very subjective viewpoint


Quick Reply: German Blown apart



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 AM.