UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

Geo question

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-02-2015, 03:36 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
Fatbloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Milton, Hants
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Geo question

This question is totally unimportant as I'll get my geo readjusted as soon as I'm happy with the ride height, it just came to mind while I was mucking around with my coilovers; when you alter the height adjustment, what effect does it have on the geo, i.e. increases/decreases camber etc? Presumably, double wishbone suspension is designed to minimise the change in camber as the wheel moves up and down over bumps, but would toe be affected more owing to the nature of the components and mounting points?

Like I say, it's not important, this kind of stuff just fascinates me (wanted to be an engineer but apparently you need something called 'qualifications' for that gig)...........
Old 08-02-2015, 03:51 PM
  #2  

 
jayok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 96
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Well,it depends on the design/setup of the suspension. But generally, if you lower the car, the camber will become more negative and the suspension will toe-in. Why? Consider if you were not lowered, but just had extra force on the wheel as you went around a bend, you'd want more grip so increasing the camber, takes the pressure of the side-wall of the tyre. Also, by toeing-in, the car will "push" back in the direction opposite to the bend (i.e. turn you out of it)

All of this of course occurs in tandem with multiple other factors, but generally that's what happens.
Old 08-02-2015, 04:17 PM
  #3  

Thread Starter
 
Fatbloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Milton, Hants
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

All makes sense. Presumably the camber change is more pronounced on ordinary suspension because the single wishbone is creating an arc, whereas double wishbone, if the inboard and outboard ends are equidistant (no idea if they are BTW) would maintain the same camber as the suspension is compressed?
Old 08-02-2015, 08:29 PM
  #4  

 
noodels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 5,655
Received 422 Likes on 386 Posts
Default

Be more worried about Toe in/out.
the only car to not have camber issues with cornering /lowering is Morgan cars with a sliding pillar 1950s design
http://www.talkmorgan.com/ubbthreads...spension_for_t
Old 08-02-2015, 10:38 PM
  #5  

 
chrispayze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 4,064
Received 134 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fatbloke
All makes sense. Presumably the camber change is more pronounced on ordinary suspension because the single wishbone is creating an arc, whereas double wishbone, if the inboard and outboard ends are equidistant (no idea if they are BTW) would maintain the same camber as the suspension is compressed?
You could design it to be parallel, yes, and this is part of the benefit of double wishbones, but in reality, it's designed to give a slightly more 'custom' response than that, depending on a number of factors, like stiffness of springs, damping, roll centre etc.
Old 08-03-2015, 04:20 AM
  #6  

 
Dembo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fatbloke
All makes sense. Presumably the camber change is more pronounced on ordinary suspension because the single wishbone is creating an arc, whereas double wishbone, if the inboard and outboard ends are equidistant (no idea if they are BTW) would maintain the same camber as the suspension is compressed?
If by "ordinary" you mean a McPherson Strut then actually the hub is clamped (by two bolts) to the damper and the wishbone pivots (at least I think that's how it works). What that means is you don't get any camber change under bump/lowering. The toe will still go out though.

If it was fixed to the single wishbone the arc would be far too small and the change far too great. Double wishbones allow the centre point of the arc to be outside the car on the other side and for the engineer to decide how much camber change they want.

The other interesting thing is that the change in angle of the wishbones lowers the roll centre (i.e. the point the car rolls around). The amount of roll is determined by the distance between the centre of gravity and the roll centre, so although lowering lowers the CofG it lowers the roll centre more and so counter-intuitively lowering increases the amount of roll.
Old 08-03-2015, 08:15 AM
  #7  

Thread Starter
 
Fatbloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Milton, Hants
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dembo
........and so counter-intuitively lowering increases the amount of roll.
Is that an absolute increase or as a percentage relative to ride height?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
4
05-07-2013 09:54 AM
FluKy15
Wheels and Tires
6
05-05-2013 04:07 PM
Clark
S2000 Racing and Competition
5
04-19-2009 03:35 PM
foz01
S2000 Racing and Competition
8
05-26-2005 09:59 AM
jzr
S2000 Under The Hood
8
01-03-2002 06:43 PM



Quick Reply: Geo question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 AM.