CR Front Lip
#2
Its not the most attractive....there are nicer ones, but you would be unique...
BOTT, no I havent got one!
BOTT, no I havent got one!
#6
Originally Posted by j8mie,Jun 24 2009, 07:04 PM
Not seen anyone else on here with the CR front spoiler. Not to my personal taste tbh.
#7
Anyone buying for HTG need to read this read;
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...ic=704475&st=0
BTW not a fan of the CR lip looks too much like one of these
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...ic=704475&st=0
BTW not a fan of the CR lip looks too much like one of these
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: There's no i in toast!
Posts: 9,022
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Cheers for that mikey. I had sent him a couple of order requests of late and not heard anything back from him. Sounds like he's got too much on his plate atm. Shame as he is a trusted source of parts.
Sti Vi - 60% increase sounds like a lot to me from just a couple of aero parts. I'd love to see how they came to that conclusion. But then on saying that the Yanks think changing air filter gives you at least 15+ bhp
Sti Vi - 60% increase sounds like a lot to me from just a couple of aero parts. I'd love to see how they came to that conclusion. But then on saying that the Yanks think changing air filter gives you at least 15+ bhp
#9
Registered User
Originally Posted by j8mie,Jun 25 2009, 05:35 PM
Sti Vi - 60% increase sounds like a lot to me from just a couple of aero parts.
Besides, the S will almost certainly not produce downforce in standard trim.
I think the 60% is the reduction in lift.
I priced up the CR lip because I really like it.
Turns out it would be in the region of
#10
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: There's no i in toast!
Posts: 9,022
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Fair point Ron.
Would like to know how those figures were arrived at. 60% of what
I would have thought that anything moving forward would generate some kind of downforce, whether it be meaningful or not. Don't know anything about this subject, just applying some logic
Would like to know how those figures were arrived at. 60% of what
I would have thought that anything moving forward would generate some kind of downforce, whether it be meaningful or not. Don't know anything about this subject, just applying some logic