Could these figures be correct?
#41
Registered User
Originally Posted by UK Paul,Jun 25 2008, 10:33 AM
only in my head has been for 9 years now....
I had a full spec. of weight saving measures, realistically I got to an affordable 70ish Kgs!!
I had a full spec. of weight saving measures, realistically I got to an affordable 70ish Kgs!!
No carbon in sight either
And as for the power? Do what eSeM suggests and stick it on TDi's dyno
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypersonik,Jun 25 2008, 11:02 AM
Well, with 20% losses, a jdm should have about 197whp.
I have obviously opened a can of worms
Rest assured, it'll be getting tested with/without for a comparison
I have obviously opened a can of worms
Rest assured, it'll be getting tested with/without for a comparison
Although I think we all know what we need to do now for a decent hike in power.
I've just got to sell this kidney and make sure I'm going to keep my licence first
Andy
#43
Registered User
Originally Posted by A7DY W,Jun 25 2008, 10:50 AM
I'll certainly be interested in looking at your results
Although I think we all know what we need to do now for a decent hike in power.
I've just got to sell this kidney and make sure I'm going to keep my licence first
Andy
Although I think we all know what we need to do now for a decent hike in power.
I've just got to sell this kidney and make sure I'm going to keep my licence first
Andy
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Newbury
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They did a special type R-R civic with ~260bhp atf didn't they? I remember it being stupidly expensive.
I imagine that's roughly the tuning limit n/a for our engine. The civic R-R power increase was acheived by reducing internal friction and ECU tweaks:
[QUOTE]Thanks to careful tuning, this car kicks out a tyre-burning 260bhp. It's the same basic i-VTEC 2.0-litre unit, but Honda has reduced friction on the internals and redesigned the camshafts. However, the greatest power gains have come from electronic improvements made using the ECU to operate the VTEC system.
I imagine that's roughly the tuning limit n/a for our engine. The civic R-R power increase was acheived by reducing internal friction and ECU tweaks:
[QUOTE]Thanks to careful tuning, this car kicks out a tyre-burning 260bhp. It's the same basic i-VTEC 2.0-litre unit, but Honda has reduced friction on the internals and redesigned the camshafts. However, the greatest power gains have come from electronic improvements made using the ECU to operate the VTEC system.
#46
Originally Posted by Hypersonik,Jun 25 2008, 10:46 AM
Seats & sound deadening - 25kg, no spare wheel, 10kg, lightweight exhaust 10kg, lightweight manifold 5kg, Superlightweight flywheel 2kg, forged wheels - 10kg, no air con 10kg.
No carbon in sight either
And as for the power? Do what eSeM suggests and stick it on TDi's dyno
No carbon in sight either
And as for the power? Do what eSeM suggests and stick it on TDi's dyno
Also Brake discs came in close to another 5kg in total, so I kept the A/C
Not sure much in the way of sound deadening on the car, but things like ALuminium boot as well as the bonnet, etc, etc.
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: THE LAKE DISTRICT BABY!!
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedUn,Jun 25 2008, 01:03 PM
Ron I think with those mods you'll make around 250-260 at the fly to get much more than that you need cams and a stroker kit.
F/I is cheating
F/I is cheating
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Apex1.0
S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum
5
07-30-2013 01:00 PM