Could these figures be correct?
#31
Member
Cool.
My justification for my comments that I don't think you will see much more power from the ECU alone, are this...
Think of the combustion triangle in an engine, on a turbo car. You have:
1) Air flow or boost
2) Ignition / spark timing
3) Amount of fuel or AFR
By optimising these 3 safely in combination, a lot of power can be had. ie add more boost, lean out a touch and advance the ignition timing.
On an N/A car you can delete number 1 as that is just a function of how hard the engine is sucking and we have no control over it.
So you are left with the following, and these are the only things your G Reddy will be able to adjust:
1) Ignition timing
2) AFR
Now your JDM will ahve quite aggressive ignition timing anyway, so you may only be able to advance it a couple of degrees. The AFR will be nearly optimum, but lets say we can shave a point off it and go from 12 to 13 (in reality you might not be able to get this much) The top end fuelling on the S is quite rich, as with most cars, so some gain will be made.
But 15 - 20 bhp is wy beyond the realm of that in my view. To put it in perspective, on a standard UK Turbo Impreza, you could only get 20 bhp from adding about 2 psi extra boost and mapping accordingly (exhaust changes aside)
Given in the S we can't even give it any positive pressure, I can't see how you would get more than a handful of bhp.
My justification for my comments that I don't think you will see much more power from the ECU alone, are this...
Think of the combustion triangle in an engine, on a turbo car. You have:
1) Air flow or boost
2) Ignition / spark timing
3) Amount of fuel or AFR
By optimising these 3 safely in combination, a lot of power can be had. ie add more boost, lean out a touch and advance the ignition timing.
On an N/A car you can delete number 1 as that is just a function of how hard the engine is sucking and we have no control over it.
So you are left with the following, and these are the only things your G Reddy will be able to adjust:
1) Ignition timing
2) AFR
Now your JDM will ahve quite aggressive ignition timing anyway, so you may only be able to advance it a couple of degrees. The AFR will be nearly optimum, but lets say we can shave a point off it and go from 12 to 13 (in reality you might not be able to get this much) The top end fuelling on the S is quite rich, as with most cars, so some gain will be made.
But 15 - 20 bhp is wy beyond the realm of that in my view. To put it in perspective, on a standard UK Turbo Impreza, you could only get 20 bhp from adding about 2 psi extra boost and mapping accordingly (exhaust changes aside)
Given in the S we can't even give it any positive pressure, I can't see how you would get more than a handful of bhp.
#32
Registered User
Yeah, I do see it your way.
As said, the CAI will help here, as will the exhaust - both are less restrictive.
But yeah, the AFR is the key here.
I don't know about the F20C, but the B-series engines I did maps for wind the ignition back MASSIVELY as well as dropping the AFR down to 11.
I know that the AFR past 8k for the F20C is around that mark.
I was sceptical about it really, but I do have a bit more optimism.
Still, it will be interesting to see and i'll definately let everyone know the result - good or bad
As said, the CAI will help here, as will the exhaust - both are less restrictive.
But yeah, the AFR is the key here.
I don't know about the F20C, but the B-series engines I did maps for wind the ignition back MASSIVELY as well as dropping the AFR down to 11.
I know that the AFR past 8k for the F20C is around that mark.
I was sceptical about it really, but I do have a bit more optimism.
Still, it will be interesting to see and i'll definately let everyone know the result - good or bad
#33
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: City Of London / Knebworth
Posts: 39,547
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypersonik,Jun 25 2008, 06:20 AM
Personally, i'm hoping for 270 with the exhuast and the CAI.
WOuld be nice to have 270+ with the Megan.
WOuld be nice to have 270+ with the Megan.
(If you use the Dyno at TDI North you might be able to make those figures at the crank from what I have seen of seen.)
We like to see rear wheel figures on here.
#34
Save your money and get the TypeR S2000 coming in Feb 09 (Last flourish of 500 cars worldwide)
265 BHp & 100Kg lighter with single exit Exhaust.
Oh, I've been writing this same 'shan since 2000...... just always coming next year.......:-(
265 BHp & 100Kg lighter with single exit Exhaust.
Oh, I've been writing this same 'shan since 2000...... just always coming next year.......:-(
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you may be being a little optimistic Hypersonik.
I opted for the J's ECU tuned to the mods on the car.
J's 70mm Dual Titanium Exhaust
Berk Tech Decat
J's Manifold
AEM V2 Intake
J's Throttle Body.
I didnt get a Dyno done on the car prior to fitting the mods but working on the figure of ~180WHP for a standard 'S' which is arguably the realistic standard output, I achieved 201 WHP with the mods.
Andy
I opted for the J's ECU tuned to the mods on the car.
J's 70mm Dual Titanium Exhaust
Berk Tech Decat
J's Manifold
AEM V2 Intake
J's Throttle Body.
I didnt get a Dyno done on the car prior to fitting the mods but working on the figure of ~180WHP for a standard 'S' which is arguably the realistic standard output, I achieved 201 WHP with the mods.
Andy
#39
Registered User
Well, with 20% losses, a jdm should have about 197whp.
I have obviously opened a can of worms
Rest assured, it'll be getting tested with/without for a comparison
I have obviously opened a can of worms
Rest assured, it'll be getting tested with/without for a comparison
#40
Originally Posted by MB,Jun 25 2008, 06:46 AM
Where is this info, Paul?? That sort of talk could sway me back
I had a full spec. of weight saving measures, realistically I got to an affordable 70ish Kgs!!