boxster s somewhat lacking?
10-26-2009, 09:23 AM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Malta
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The BoX S 05 onwards i.e. '987' model leaves the S behind.
The 2.7 against a non VSA S2000 is also very strong on the twisties.
Drove both types as well as the Cayman (which felt more planted even with traction control off).
I like the 987 a lot. But i like the S2K a lot too.
The 2.7 against a non VSA S2000 is also very strong on the twisties.
Drove both types as well as the Cayman (which felt more planted even with traction control off).
I like the 987 a lot. But i like the S2K a lot too.
10-26-2009, 09:25 AM
#22
Originally Posted by Nickamsweet,Oct 26 2009, 04:25 PM
I have driven a Boxter S and obviously an S2000... and the S2000 is a far more exciting drive... it felt like the S was considerably quicker than the boxter!
Still a nice car though
Still a nice car though
That's why it's a bit addictive.
10-26-2009, 12:18 PM
#23
Jap performance. Think I've still got that issue someplace.
10-26-2009, 04:00 PM
#24
Originally Posted by s2000malta,Oct 26 2009, 06:23 PM
The BoX S 05 onwards i.e. '987' model leaves the S behind.
The 2.7 against a non VSA S2000 is also very strong on the twisties.
Drove both types as well as the Cayman (which felt more planted even with traction control off).
I like the 987 a lot. But i like the S2K a lot too.
The 2.7 against a non VSA S2000 is also very strong on the twisties.
Drove both types as well as the Cayman (which felt more planted even with traction control off).
I like the 987 a lot. But i like the S2K a lot too.
(Assuming one can drive it)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post