S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Zarqawi captured?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-05-2005 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Nothing in the New York Times yet either. It was updated at 9:54 PM
Old 01-05-2005 | 08:35 PM
  #12  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,311
Likes: 36
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

I don't know if capture of the "bosses" has any long-term impact on terrorism, Rob. Don't get me wrong, I agree with flts on this too, but I seriously doubt that being captured is one of the things these guys are worried about when they become who they are.
Old 01-05-2005 | 08:58 PM
  #13  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Jan 5 2005, 11:35 PM
I don't know if capture of the "bosses" has any long-term impact on terrorism, Rob. Don't get me wrong, I agree with flts on this too, but I seriously doubt that being captured is one of the things these guys are worried about when they become who they are.
Chaz

I don't know whether or not a character like Zarqawi himself has or had any concern about being captured, nor do I care. My point was that his capture will do very little to weaken the terrorist organization or the terrorist activity.

In a traditional war the capture of the leaders goes a long way towards ending the war. The foot soldiers look to the leaders for direction, inspiration and strategy. This war, however, is not a traditional war.

To change the subject slightly, I just checked the New York Times again and there is still no mention of his capture.
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:29 AM
  #14  
MsPerky's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 43,939
Likes: 3,040
From: Arlington, VA
Default

^ I'll keep looking also...you would think, in spite of the overwhelming coverage of the tsunami, that this would merit a mention if it is true.
Old 01-06-2005 | 03:03 AM
  #15  
NNY S2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 25,136
Likes: 330
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

I havn't heard anything on this yet...must be a false rumor. Like the saying goes...If it sounds too good to be true, then...
Old 01-06-2005 | 06:22 AM
  #16  
Zippy's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 151
From: West Deptford NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Jan 5 2005, 11:35 PM
I don't know if capture of the "bosses" has any long-term impact on terrorism, Rob.
The intelligence agencies have compared AQ to a hydra. Cut off one head and it will grow back two. That said, I believe that the aid that we are providing to Indonesian at this time will do more to quell future attacks then all the bullets and bombs that we have used to attempt to install our government in Iraq.
Old 01-06-2005 | 07:07 AM
  #17  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Zippy,Jan 6 2005, 09:22 AM
That said, I believe that the aid that we are providing to Indonesian at this time will do more to quell future attacks then all the bullets and bombs that we have used to attempt to install our government in Iraq.


I agree. That what I've always thought assuming that the money and aid actually goes to where it's needed, and not into the closet of some dictator.
Old 01-06-2005 | 07:10 AM
  #18  
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Somerville, MA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Jan 5 2005, 06:32 PM
I was talking about the bigger picture. I was talking about whether or not Zarqawi's capture would make much difference in terms of the terrorist organizations and the overall terrorist activity. I was talking about his leadership and command of the terrorists under him. I think someone else will step up and take over.
I think you're right. After all, Zarqawi picked up the reins when Osama ended up in hiding.

I think it will take a few months for the "succession" to work itself out, though, while the next level of leaders talk it out or fight it out amongst themselves. During that time, the group will be much less effective. From that standpoint, the capture, if true, is nicely timed as it means the Iraqi elections will happen while Zarqawi's group is going through the succession process.
Old 01-06-2005 | 09:08 AM
  #19  
OhioRacer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 9
From: Myrtle Beach, SC
Default

Warren, you have a PM from me. Click the top right of your screen where it should say "1 PM".
Old 01-06-2005 | 12:05 PM
  #20  
Ulrich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Heh... You've got to go back to the link and read the user comments (did not see any yesterday). Aside from the horrendous spelling, some of them are actually quite entertaining.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Hoth
New England S2000 Owners
35
08-22-2008 09:33 PM
MikeyCB
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
6
05-22-2007 06:11 PM



Quick Reply: Zarqawi captured?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 AM.