S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Vote

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-03-2004, 02:04 PM
  #111  

 
fltsfshr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,868
Received 1,058 Likes on 540 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Nov 3 2004, 06:40 PM
He just said the Republicans were very successful in convincing a certain class of bigots to vote on their side.
You can get in trouble refering to NASCAR like that...




fltsfshr
fltsfshr is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:07 PM
  #112  
Registered User
 
jmc1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh, Lord. He's insulted the left-turn only fans.

In before the (re)lock.
jmc1971 is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:11 PM
  #113  
Registered User
 
rjosey8385's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rockwall, TEXAS!
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fltsfshr,Nov 3 2004, 06:04 PM
You can get in trouble refering to NASCAR like that...
rjosey8385 is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:15 PM
  #114  

 
anarky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milford
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From Current Events and Politics Forum - y2ks2k 10/31/04 1:45 am
You'd better get that IQ checked again. 1/3rd of Bush supporters are radical evangelical Christians. A good sociological study will tell you that these people have on average 11 IQ point lower then a typical American and a lower income level. To boot, simple voter maps will show you that rural communities vote Repub and Urban communities vote Democrat. These are just facts. Clearly the centers of intelligence in this country are not found on the farm....
To jmc1971 - Don't feel too bad. You are in good company.

The above quote shows me that many Kerry supporters have a skewed view of who and what constitutes a Bush supporter. Generalizations and distortions. Sounds like "bigotry" to me. I, for one, am tired of the "bigot" and "racist" terms being thrown around quite "liberally". These traits are shared by people from across the political/racial/cultural/religious spectrum. Honest disagreement on basic issues does NOT make someone a racist or bigot. Because someone may be against gay marriage does NOT mean that they are anti-gay.
Because someone is against affirmative action does NOT mean that they are anti-minority. Because someone is anti-abortion does NOT mean that they are anti-women's rights. There are some people who disagree with these positions on deeply held principle and, in many cases, sound and reasoned thought. I am continually amazed at the people who claim to be more feeling, caring and "fair" labeling people who legitimately disagree with their positions as somehow "racist", "bigots" or "extremists". You can try to couch the condemnation in terms such as "some" or by making blanket statements and yet "exempting" the person that you are arguing with but that doesn't mean you haven't made that call. Bubba, if you want to throw mud then stand up and defend yourself. Don't hide behind "whinging" (one of my favorite Brit terms) and weak justifications. If you think that someone is a bigot, go for it. But I suggest that you look real hard in the mirror and think long before you start calling people out. I, personally, found the above quote to be condescending, ignorant and offensive in the extreme. I also called the person on it and received no response. Please think about what you are REALLY saying when you start throwing verbal bombs. You get upset when someone questions your motivations and beliefs but continue to do the same to others. Not Cool.
anarky is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:26 PM
  #115  
Gold Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,708
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anarky,Nov 3 2004, 06:15 PM
From Current Events and Politics Forum - y2ks2k 10/31/04 1:45 am


To jmc1971 - Don't feel too bad. You are in good company.

The above quote shows me that many Kerry supporters have a skewed view of who and what constitutes a Bush supporter. Generalizations and distortions. Sounds like "bigotry" to me. I, for one, am tired of the "bigot" and "racist" terms being thrown around quite "liberally". These traits are shared by people from across the political/racial/cultural/religious spectrum. Honest disagreement on basic issues does NOT make someone a racist or bigot. Because someone may be against gay marriage does NOT mean that they are anti-gay.
Because someone is against affirmative action does NOT mean that they are anti-minority. Because someone is anti-abortion does NOT mean that they are anti-women's rights. There are some people who disagree with these positions on deeply held principle and, in many cases, sound and reasoned thought. I am continually amazed at the people who claim to be more feeling, caring and "fair" labeling people who legitimately disagree with their positions as somehow "racist", "bigots" or "extremists". You can try to couch the condemnation in terms such as "some" or by making blanket statements and yet "exempting" the person that you are arguing with but that doesn't mean you haven't made that call. Bubba, if you want to throw mud then stand up and defend yourself. Don't hide behind "whinging" (one of my favorite Brit terms) and weak justifications. If you think that someone is a bigot, go for it. But I suggest that you look real hard in the mirror and think long before you start calling people out. I, personally, found the above quote to be condescending, ignorant and offensive in the extreme. I also called the person on it and received no response. Please think about what you are REALLY saying when you start throwing verbal bombs. You get upset when someone questions your motivations and beliefs but continue to do the same to others. Not Cool.


Unfortunately there is stupidity on both sides of the aisle. Unfortunately, as we have seen in this thread, good debate and discussion is oftentimes poisoned by bad finger pointing and name calling.

We can take the high road or we can take the low road. I prefer the high road.
ralper is online now  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:27 PM
  #116  
Registered User
 
rjosey8385's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rockwall, TEXAS!
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Amen! Well stated, Anarky!
rjosey8385 is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:30 PM
  #117  
Registered User
 
jmc1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Nov 3 2004, 06:26 PM
We can take the high road or we can take the low road. I prefer the high road.
Yes, but does the high road have lots of twisties??
jmc1971 is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:32 PM
  #118  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anarky,Nov 3 2004, 03:15 PM
Because someone may be against gay marriage does NOT mean that they are anti-gay.
It's hard to see how. Separate but equal?

Originally Posted by anarky,Nov 3 2004, 03:15 PM
Because someone is against affirmative action does NOT mean that they are anti-minority. Because someone is anti-abortion does NOT mean that they are anti-women's rights.
True. But who said it did? In this thread, anyway?

Originally Posted by anarky,Nov 3 2004, 03:15 PM
I am continually amazed at the people who claim to be more feeling, caring and "fair" labeling people who legitimately disagree with their positions as somehow "racist", "bigots" or "extremists".
[...] I, personally, found the above quote to be condescending, ignorant and offensive in the extreme. I also called the person on it and received no response. Please think about what you are REALLY saying when you start throwing verbal bombs. You get upset when someone questions your motivations and beliefs but continue to do the same to others. Not Cool.
The above quote didn't come from this discussion. Not until you brought it here. I know Jeff didn't say it.

Hey, I'm bigoted against certain things. I have my reasons for that. I strongly believe that creationists are just plain wrong, for instance. Theists too, for that matter. But as long as they don't use our government to promote their beliefs, I don't care.
mikegarrison is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:42 PM
  #119  

 
anarky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milford
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mike,

I think maybe you are a little too literal minded. The positions that I mentioned were examples used to illustrate a point ie; that because someone is against a postition does not make them against a possible proponent of the position. I don't wish to debate the gay marriage issue in this forum. If you want to start a thread (or maybe ask Chazmo if he should let one be created), then I would be happy to post my thoughts.

Like it or not the government is in the business of social engineering. Why do think that there IS a government in the first place. It sounds as if you just don't like the current engineering drawings.
anarky is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 02:56 PM
  #120  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anarky,Nov 3 2004, 03:42 PM
Like it or not the government is in the business of social engineering. Why do think that there IS a government in the first place. It sounds as if you just don't like the current engineering drawings.
Actually, I like the engineering drawings OK. I just don't like the mods that some people are trying to hang on it.

Of course, other people don't agree with the mods that I think need to be done, either.

I will say, though, that if anybody here thinks I have made a personal attack against them, well it wasn't intentional. Suffice to say, you would know for darn sure if I were making a personal attack against you. Attacking someone's stated position or argument logic is not a personal attack.
mikegarrison is offline  


Quick Reply: Vote



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 AM.