Virginia executes No. 101
#1
Thread Starter
Virginia executes No. 101
Yesterday the State of Virginia executed a 26 year old man for a murder he committed in 2000. His was the 101st execution since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. Virginia ranks #9 (as of 2006 statistics) in executions in the United States. I have to ask the question, what did we accomplish in executing this man? Is execution a fitting punishment for his crime? Does taking a life reinstate somehow the life he took? I just can't see how we justify a murder for a murder.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 297 Miles E of the Dragon
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Val,
I doubt the death penalty is much of deterrent. However, I hope this woman is #102, when and if she is found guilty, of course. My Brother-in-law's brother was the victim.
Dave
Murder Suspect
I doubt the death penalty is much of deterrent. However, I hope this woman is #102, when and if she is found guilty, of course. My Brother-in-law's brother was the victim.
Dave
Murder Suspect
#3
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by parkerdt,Jul 11 2008, 06:15 PM
Val,
I doubt the death penalty is much of deterrent. However, I hope this woman is #102, when and if she is found guilty, of course. My Brother-in-law's brother was the victim.
Dave
Murder Suspect
I doubt the death penalty is much of deterrent. However, I hope this woman is #102, when and if she is found guilty, of course. My Brother-in-law's brother was the victim.
Dave
Murder Suspect
#6
ok I see two sides to the death penalty and both are probably derived from being an engineer.
The first is assuring that the correct individual(s) are being executed.
For rather obvious reasons you cannot reverse this decision and say 'oops my bad, sorry 'bout that."
Given the amount of decisions that have been turned over due to changes in DNA evidence capability as well as just plain bad justice which we see time and time again in poor and disadvantaged, this really gives me pause.
The second which you could say is a support for the death penalty is efficiency.
How much does it cost to incarcerate and individual for life?
Now I have heard but do not have substantiating citations that the appeals process for a death row case will actually exceed the cost of lockup.
I am not in favor of reducing the appeal process either, for the reasons mentioned in the first argument.
I will mention that serial killers, especially those involving little kids, do get special consideration.
At some point the preponderance of evidence shall aggregate to remove any lingering doubts.
These individuals have cast aside their humanity and should be stripped of their mortal coils as it were.
The first is assuring that the correct individual(s) are being executed.
For rather obvious reasons you cannot reverse this decision and say 'oops my bad, sorry 'bout that."
Given the amount of decisions that have been turned over due to changes in DNA evidence capability as well as just plain bad justice which we see time and time again in poor and disadvantaged, this really gives me pause.
The second which you could say is a support for the death penalty is efficiency.
How much does it cost to incarcerate and individual for life?
Now I have heard but do not have substantiating citations that the appeals process for a death row case will actually exceed the cost of lockup.
I am not in favor of reducing the appeal process either, for the reasons mentioned in the first argument.
I will mention that serial killers, especially those involving little kids, do get special consideration.
At some point the preponderance of evidence shall aggregate to remove any lingering doubts.
These individuals have cast aside their humanity and should be stripped of their mortal coils as it were.
#7
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by parkerdt,Jul 11 2008, 06:39 PM
Sorry, I simply do not agree, in this case.
Dave
Dave
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by batguano,Jul 11 2008, 03:15 PM
Execution accomplishes one thing.
He won't kill again.
He won't kill again.
While I place the blame solely on the corrupt judicial system that BADLY needs reformed, I still feel that there are some crimes that deserve death, if for no other reason so that they do not commit those crimes again.
And while it may seem cold, I must remind you.....
All men die. Not every man has owned an S2000!
#9
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 297 Miles E of the Dragon
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by valentine,Jul 11 2008, 06:56 PM
I can certainly understand your feelings and say we can agree to disagree. I really am torn about this issue and have a hard time forming an opinion one way or the other. It is very difficult for me to say just kill 'em and yet I have no real alternative means of bringing them to justice.
Dave
#10
I am for the death penalty, I think. But then, if I had to be the one to do the deed, I don't know if I could. That's when killing is okay?
I imagine if there was a criminal, who brutaly killed someone I loved, and showed no remorse about it, sitting in, let's say, an electric chair, and I had to flick the switch, I would want to do it.
I didn't read your link, Valentine, but I will go back and do it now.
**EDIT** Oh, you didn't have a link. It was Dave.
I imagine if there was a criminal, who brutaly killed someone I loved, and showed no remorse about it, sitting in, let's say, an electric chair, and I had to flick the switch, I would want to do it.
I didn't read your link, Valentine, but I will go back and do it now.
**EDIT** Oh, you didn't have a link. It was Dave.