The Vintage Forum Weather Thread
#171
True...that is the projection at this point.
#172
Stay safe those in the path of the storm.
We have a day off from heat and humidity. Just went for a walk. It was 64 degrees and breezy. New England weather.
We have a day off from heat and humidity. Just went for a walk. It was 64 degrees and breezy. New England weather.
#175
Damn, not good.
#176
No impact way over here in Mississippi. We are thankful but concerned for those in southwest Louisiana who took the brunt of this storm.
Fortunately, because Laura moved with such exceptional forward speed, storm surge there was less than what was feared. But the storm's fast forward movement also means parts of Louisiana that are well inland are experiencing Cat 2 hurricane winds this morning and Little Rock, AK is under a tropical storm warning.
Looks like Jim's area was also spared the worst as east Texas ended up on the west side of the storm center where conditions are far less severe.
Fortunately, because Laura moved with such exceptional forward speed, storm surge there was less than what was feared. But the storm's fast forward movement also means parts of Louisiana that are well inland are experiencing Cat 2 hurricane winds this morning and Little Rock, AK is under a tropical storm warning.
Looks like Jim's area was also spared the worst as east Texas ended up on the west side of the storm center where conditions are far less severe.
#177
Registered User
Can you explain that Mike? I watched a couple hours of the weather channel last night and they kept talking about 6,9 12 and even 20 feet of unservivable storm surge. Today they are ignoring the fact that they were way off, but I'd like to know why. After all, they weren't predicting days ahead, only one or two hours.
#178
No chance of fires here. We are getting one t-storm after another with a flash flood warning for tonight. Then tomorrow we get lots of rain from Laura.
#179
Can you explain that Mike? I watched a couple hours of the weather channel last night and they kept talking about 6,9 12 and even 20 feet of unservivable storm surge. Today they are ignoring the fact that they were way off, but I'd like to know why. After all, they weren't predicting days ahead, only one or two hours.
In the case of Laura, my understanding is that it was such a fast moving storm that water simply didn't have time to pile up into a major storm surge. The surge is a function of wind speed, size of the storm system, shape of the shoreline, tide levels as the storm approaches shore, and the amount of time the storm takes to approach the shore and make landfall.
They don't always get it wrong. Katrina hit with a storm surge between 28 and 32 feet. That was pretty close to the maximum predictions. I don't know the numbers for Sandy but I believe her storm surge did a huge amount of damage to the east coast regardless of what was predicted vs. what the actual surge level was.
News directors and meteorologists would probably tell you that it is better to err on the high side when predicting sever weather impact, but others would argue that this is just the media crying wolf, taking the impact out of their watches and warnings.
This picture gives you some idea of just what kind of damage storm surge can do. Those concrete slabs were houses before Katrina arrived. This scene was repeated across sixty miles of Mississippi coastline where one town pretty much blends into the next.
#180
The thing to remember about that storm surge is it has waves on top of it.