S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

New Toy

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-05-2017 | 04:12 AM
  #21  
Scooterboy's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 27,876
Likes: 2,895
From: Medina, OH
Default

Originally Posted by jukngene
Better be careful...Scooterboy has had his eye on one for a while. Keep the alarm armed!
He's safe. I bought a house instead!
Old 01-05-2017 | 05:26 AM
  #22  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,113
Likes: 109
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by MAGGIEMAE
Measurements 160HP 1.4Litre 4 banger with more torque than the S (184Lbs). It is related to the MX-5 but is a bit less hardcore.

Gene Plans are to bring her to SF.
It looks great! I love that profile view. BUT..."Ashley" for an Italian girl????
Old 01-06-2017 | 08:16 AM
  #23  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 71
From: Toronto
Default

Long story but point taken
Old 01-06-2017 | 09:51 AM
  #24  
kgf3076's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 29,471
Likes: 1,146
From: Six Metro stops short of insanity.
Default

Originally Posted by MAGGIEMAE
Measurements 160HP 1.4Litre 4 banger with more torque than the S (184Lbs). It is related to the MX-5 but is a bit less hardcore.

Gene Plans are to bring her to SF.
Not quite as torquey or as fast as the Miata, I looked at one a while ago (right after they were introduced) and Car & Driver comparison tested the two of them. I had 3 Spyders, was seriously tempted to make it four. Next silly, totally non-necessary toy purchase will be either a Genesis Coupe or a Subayota BRZ.

Last edited by kgf3076; 01-06-2017 at 09:53 AM.
Old 01-06-2017 | 11:16 AM
  #25  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 71
From: Toronto
Default

You sir are misinformed 148 vs 184 Lbs of torque as to speed very close but it iS slightly slower with a softer ride. That is one reason I went for it as we already have the hard core driver the S
Old 01-06-2017 | 04:12 PM
  #26  
kgf3076's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 29,471
Likes: 1,146
From: Six Metro stops short of insanity.
Default

Originally Posted by MAGGIEMAE
You sir are misinformed 148 vs 184 Lbs of torque as to speed very close but it iS slightly slower with a softer ride. That is one reason I went for it as we already have the hard core driver the S
Oops, you're right. It's been a while since I read that review. It is slower (heavier as well, if I remember correctly). Biggest problem is that it's a FIAT (says the person who had 2 124 Sedans, a couple of 124 Spyders and other miscellaneous FIAT products over a couple of years).
Old 01-07-2017 | 03:46 AM
  #27  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 71
From: Toronto
Default

About 100 lbs heavier and 5 inches longer and only marginally slower in all tests that I have seen. As to the Fiat comment to paraphrase " This is not your fathers Fiat" There has been a great improvement in quality and remember it is built in Hiroshima What could go wrong
Old 01-11-2017 | 12:50 PM
  #28  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 71
From: Toronto
Default

Proud new owner
Old 01-11-2017 | 01:04 PM
  #29  
jukngene's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 14,462
Likes: 1,713
From: Delawhere???
Default

Old 01-11-2017 | 01:23 PM
  #30  
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,038
Likes: 469
From: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Default

Originally Posted by jukngene
X2


Quick Reply: New Toy



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 AM.