S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

How about a controversial thread?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-02-2005, 07:47 PM
  #1441  
Gold Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,713
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,159 Posts
Default

You should register. It's free.
Old 04-05-2005, 01:47 PM
  #1442  

 
Honda 367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 5,331
Received 473 Likes on 337 Posts
Default

In light of recent death of Pope, what do you all think about the next Pope? Do you think it is now time for someone from Latin America to become the next Pope? I know somewhere between 114-117 Cardinals will decide who will be the next leader for the Catholic church. I thought it would be interesting to see where the church will go from here.
Old 04-05-2005, 03:11 PM
  #1443  
Registered User

 
Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Napa
Posts: 7,405
Received 1,103 Likes on 699 Posts
Default

I heard on the news a couple days before the Pope died that he accepted the resignations of several cardinals and named their replacements. Do you think he really did it, or was his would-be successor lining up his supporters to get elected?
Old 04-05-2005, 03:35 PM
  #1444  
Member (Premium)
 
Kyras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 43,310
Received 3,527 Likes on 1,909 Posts
Default

I don't know about the next Pope but I wonder how much of a dent in population growth there would be if the new Pope encouraged birth control.
Old 04-05-2005, 03:56 PM
  #1445  

 
Honda 367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 5,331
Received 473 Likes on 337 Posts
Default

I don't know about that. But 1.1 billion members around the world and only 117 Cardinals, I was thinking that is a very exclusive band of brothers. It is almost like each Cardinal is a head of a state. My best regards to our Catholic brothers and sisters in this very somber time of Pope's death. I was at the Capital waiting in line for over 4 hours to pay respect to our former President Ronald Reagan but the lines in Vatican for viewing the Pope is miles long, I heard.
Old 04-05-2005, 04:58 PM
  #1446  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
paS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Philly (Narberth)
Posts: 18,875
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Honda 367,Apr 5 2005, 06:56 PM
.....I was at the Capital waiting in line for over 4 hours to pay respect to our former President Ronald Reagan but the lines in Vatican for viewing the Pope is miles long, I heard.
Now this could start a bit of controversy.
Old 04-05-2005, 07:39 PM
  #1447  
Gold Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,713
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,159 Posts
Default

Here's some controversy for you.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/06/politics...artner=homepage

Political Groups Paid Two Relatives of House Leader
Old 04-06-2005, 02:26 AM
  #1448  

 
fltsfshr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,868
Received 1,058 Likes on 540 Posts
Default

Check out Florida's new right to defend yourself law. If I were a bad guy, I'd be scared.
Now we not only have a right to carry, we have a right to use.

Here's an excerpt from our local fishwrapper.
"
The measure makes it clear in state law what courts have generally ruled in Florida
Old 04-06-2005, 02:42 AM
  #1449  

 
Honda 367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 5,331
Received 473 Likes on 337 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paS2K,Apr 5 2005, 08:58 PM
Now this could start a bit of controversy.
I imagine people in St. Peter's Basilica might have to wait more than 12 hours. I don't know if I can stand in line for that long. Can you imagine if you were over there right now. All the other tourist attractions must be fairly empty.
Old 04-06-2005, 03:53 AM
  #1450  
Registered User
 
dean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fltsfshr,Apr 6 2005, 06:26 AM
The bill says that person has "the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so, to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another."
I missed this in the paper, and there were no reports of it here on the news. Does the law also define "reasonable belief"?


Quick Reply: How about a controversial thread?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.