The gals say the S2000 is sexy & gota have
#21
Originally Posted by ralper,Jun 7 2005, 08:33 PM
The funny thing is that while I mostly like the styling of our S, some parts of it don't work perfectly. It isn't and wasn't for me the "most beautiful" design I'd ever seen.
I was thinking "SSM or SSX?" so I must have seen both designations.
#22
Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Jun 7 2005, 11:46 PM
I was thinking "SSM or SSX?" so I must have seen both designations.
Like several of you, it was the ENGINE that hooked me and the total package (handling, gearbox, suspension, etc.) sold me.
#26
I'm curious which parts of the styling you guys don't like...
For me, I think the front end of the car is absolutely gorgeous. The front fenders -- which start mostly vertical by the windshield and reach out to mostly horizontal by the headlights -- are works of art (IMO). What I don't like is the rear quarter panels above the wheels. Because there's no crease or vents, a side view of the car (because it's a wedge) gives an optical illusion that the wheels are smaller than the fronts.
But, really, overall I think the S is a really good-looking car. It ain't a Pininfarina design, yeah, but few look as good to me. Just my opin.
For me, I think the front end of the car is absolutely gorgeous. The front fenders -- which start mostly vertical by the windshield and reach out to mostly horizontal by the headlights -- are works of art (IMO). What I don't like is the rear quarter panels above the wheels. Because there's no crease or vents, a side view of the car (because it's a wedge) gives an optical illusion that the wheels are smaller than the fronts.
But, really, overall I think the S is a really good-looking car. It ain't a Pininfarina design, yeah, but few look as good to me. Just my opin.
#27
The front carries ALL the styling clues. Almost every ad or professional photo of the car is the front. The sides are a just a little to conservative (bland?) for me. I find both the sides and back nice to look at but I wish the sides had a little more excitement.... brake vents or something other than a plain slab. When the top is up the car's shape works well, as it gives off a 50s hot rod look - a well done one to be sure. A stunning car to me, for comparison, is the new Aston Martin. That is drop dead beautiful IMO.
#28
Originally Posted by dlq04,Jun 8 2005, 09:19 AM
...The sides are a just a little to conservative (bland?) for me. I find both the sides and back nice to look at but I wish the sides had a little more excitement.... brake vents or something other than a plain slab.
...A stunning car to me, for comparison, is the new Aston Martin. That is drop dead beautiful IMO.
...A stunning car to me, for comparison, is the new Aston Martin. That is drop dead beautiful IMO.
I think the bare-ish look of the S2000 sides is nice. The Z4 is waaay too busy with their side styling for my tastes. Too much of that stuff can ruin classic lines and age a design too quickly. KISS. The understatement, to me, only brings out the flow of the lines more.
#29
Jeff, I agree with understatement approach. I think the Z3 and Z4 are two of the ugliest sports cars made. The new Lotus is an example of extreme overkill styling that would get old quickly. However, since the S2000 lacks the advantage of roundness except around the front wheels & nose, it fails to capture the reflective qualities of cars like the new Aston. Maybe what it needs is a racing number on the side!
#30
Originally Posted by Chazmo,Jun 8 2005, 06:58 AM
I'm curious which parts of the styling you guys don't like...