S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Front brake pads

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-04-2009 | 01:50 PM
  #11  
Jet sitter's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,169
Likes: 22
Default

Great observation.
Old 05-04-2009 | 02:17 PM
  #12  
PanteraKitty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 1
From: Stockbridge, Georgia
Default


Last time I looked, the inboard pads were wearing faster than the outboard pads - on all four wheels.
Old 05-04-2009 | 02:29 PM
  #13  
tof's Avatar
tof
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 15,258
Likes: 2,124
From: Long Beach, MS
Default

^ Same here. I just replaced the front pads.
Old 05-04-2009 | 02:32 PM
  #14  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by PanteraKitty,May 4 2009, 03:17 PM
Last time I looked, the inboard pads were wearing faster than the outboard pads - on all four wheels.
Rather typical on an S2000. You should also see the leading edge of the pad (the part that is swept first by the rotor) being more worn.
Old 05-04-2009 | 02:50 PM
  #15  
raymo19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,471
Likes: 0
From: Flintstone GA
Default

Originally Posted by PanteraKitty,May 4 2009, 06:17 PM
Last time I looked, the inboard pads were wearing faster than the outboard pads - on all four wheels.
Crap! I hadn't considered that. Time for a closer look and most likely pad replacement all around. Fluid flush too.

Thanks for the heads up.
Old 05-04-2009 | 02:56 PM
  #16  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by raymo19,May 4 2009, 03:50 PM
Crap! I hadn't considered that. Time for a closer look and most likely pad replacement all around. Fluid flush too.

Thanks for the heads up.
Normally it's not a big difference, but it's consistant and enough to be seen by eye if you pull the pads out and lay them against each other.

The wear indicator is on the inside pad, so you shouldn't totally wear down the inside without any warning. (This is not true for track pads, which typically have no wear indicators.)

If you have a massively big difference between inside and outside, check the slide pins to make sure they are not binding.
Old 05-04-2009 | 08:22 PM
  #17  
Matt_in_VA's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,381
Likes: 526
From: Clifton, VA
Default

[QUOTE=raymo19,May 4 2009, 05:35 PM] "Son you have to use something to wear it out."
Old 05-05-2009 | 12:00 PM
  #18  
hirev's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,531
Likes: 15
From: SF Bay Area
Default

40k, original pads, they look ok still, perhaps in another 5-10K it is time to change.
Old 05-05-2009 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by Jet sitter,May 4 2009, 01:11 PM
I just checked by front brake pads at 30K and found that they were worn below 1/2 of the pad. The rears are fine. I changed the front/rear pads on my 2000 Accord at 105K. Is this normal wear for the S?
Depends on what you do with the car. If you track, stock pads will not last very long at all.

You may want to look at different compounds - just be sure you keep within the operating temperature range (ie don't get race pads for the street - you'll never keep them up to operating temp).
Old 05-05-2009 | 03:10 PM
  #20  
CaptainMike's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 5
From: Hurricane City, FL
Default

I'm on my second set of OEM fronts (original rears) and on my 5th or 6th (I'm thinking I forgot to log one) set of track pads (all 4 wheels) at 48,000 miles.


Quick Reply: Front brake pads



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:12 PM.