S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Cost of living

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-26-2008 | 07:21 PM
  #91  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Gas is relatively cheap here in New Jersey. Regular is about 3.47/9 and 93 octane is about 3.67/9 (give or take a few pennies depending upon where you buy it). Unfortunately the price of everything else has skyrocketed.

Without question the main contributing factor is the price of oil, but the price itself is only half the problem, the other half of the problem is how fast it has increased. Had it increased as a slower pace, the economy might have had a chance to absorb some of the increase and find some new level of equalibrium, but because of the rapid increase it has created a knee jerk reaction throughout the rest of the economy causing a spurt in all the rest of the prices.

Wages, of course, have not kept up with the increase and that too has created problems. Cost going up faster than salaries creates a decreased demand throughout the marketplace and ultimately a stagnant economy.

Welcome back to the 1970s. We are once again in stagflation. Ironically, the villian is once again the barrel of oil and the rapid increase in price.

Not to get political but if a few dollars had been invested into the research and development of alternative energy sources a lot of this might've been prevented.
Old 04-26-2008 | 07:39 PM
  #92  
PanteraKitty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 1
From: Stockbridge, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by RC - Ryder,Apr 26 2008, 04:46 PM
I agree with Bill, but chickens eat more corn on a weight basis, though they are much more efficient feed utilizers.
Is chicken feed still made from grain? I thought modern chickens were raised on chemicals so they could be sent to market in 2 months rather than a year.
Old 04-26-2008 | 07:39 PM
  #93  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,113
Likes: 109
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Vanishing Point,Apr 26 2008, 01:57 PM
I have, and still don't see how not eating beef will save fuel! Unless your buying the BS the PETA and GreenPeace crowd espouse.
Reduce the demand for beef so the cost of grain goes down so the cost of ethanol goes down. Then you can buy an ethanol car. that will save more gas for my boat!
Old 04-26-2008 | 07:40 PM
  #94  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,113
Likes: 109
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by martha,Apr 26 2008, 03:03 PM
I have no idea what LB had in mind, but with the shortage of corn due to the demand for it for ethanol, the feed lots are short of corn for feeding the cattle. And feed prices are much higher. Maybe that's what he was talking about, but then you just never know.
The Shadow knows.....
Old 04-26-2008 | 07:43 PM
  #95  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,113
Likes: 109
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyBalls,Apr 26 2008, 01:08 PM
You guys know that we have more in our reserves now then we did in 1999 right? There is no shortage of OIL, its as high as it is based on pure "speculation".
I have yet to hear or understand how releasing oil from the reserves will change the situation long term. It might help for 2 to 6 months, but then things will be worse
Old 04-26-2008 | 07:47 PM
  #96  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,113
Likes: 109
From: Canton, MA
Default

[QUOTE=ralper,Apr 26 2008, 10:21 PM] Gas is relatively cheap here in New Jersey.
Old 04-26-2008 | 08:07 PM
  #97  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Apr 26 2008, 10:47 PM
I agree for the most part, but I think nuclear is a big part of the solution, along with exploiting resources in Alaska and the Gulf.

In the alternative, we could have all done something. The demand for larger vehicles and more powerful vehicles is a big contributor.

That said, I am quite sure that current and future demand from countries like China and India will be the tidal wave that sweeps our oil-based econommy away. A country with labor rates that are 1/10 of ours can afford to pay a lot more for gas and still be the lowest price provider.
Bill,

I don't think further exploration/exploitation of Alaska or the Gulf would make much difference in the long run, but I do agree that nuclear energy could and should be part of the solution. I also think the government should have sponsored research and development into other alternative energy sources such as wind and solar and others that might have been thought of had more dollars been invested. By now we should have been well on our way to freedom from oil.

Like you I think the demand for bigger and more powerful vehicles has been a major contributor both to oil prices and global pollution. Like you I'd like to see every SUV and pickup crushed. Certainly any engine bigger than 6 cylinders should be taken off the road, and six cylinders allowed only by special permission. Given my druthers there'd be no passenger vehicle on the road heavier than 3,000 lbs. Anything bigger than a Civic is just too big.

I too think the demand for oil by India and China will prove to be a problem, but I think that's still a generation or two in the future. Hopefully by that time we will have developed some alternative energy sources. For right now I think the problem is the oil cartel and the market manipulation by big oil and those who profiteer from the increased prices.
Old 04-27-2008 | 03:55 AM
  #98  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 32,529
Likes: 4,150
From: bolton
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Apr 27 2008, 12:07 AM
I too think the demand for oil by India and China will prove to be a problem, but I think that's still a generation or two in the future. Hopefully by that time we will have developed some alternative energy sources. For right now I think the problem is the oil cartel and the market manipulation by big oil and those who profiteer from the increased prices.
I wish I could agree with you that the problem was that far away but the chinese economy is growing at 15-25% per year.
They are rapidly transitioning from an agrarian to industrial economy.
Until now a large part of the economic growth had come from exports.
I suspect they have reached the critical mass where future growth can come from internal consumption.
I seriously think this problem is less than 10 years away, potentially shorter.
Old 04-27-2008 | 05:10 AM
  #99  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue,Apr 27 2008, 06:55 AM
I wish I could agree with you that the problem was that far away but the chinese economy is growing at 15-25% per year.
They are rapidly transitioning from an agrarian to industrial economy.
Until now a large part of the economic growth had come from exports.
I suspect they have reached the critical mass where future growth can come from internal consumption.
I seriously think this problem is less than 10 years away, potentially shorter.
I highly doubt that the Chinese economy can continue to grow at that pace indefinately and I think there are probably more oil reserves than we currently know of. Moreover, as the price of crude continues to rise it becomes economically feasible to extract shale oil of which there is supposed to be an enormous amount.

I'm not saying that the competition for oil from the industrializing nations, and especially China and India, doesn't represent a problem, but I think we still have some time.
Old 04-27-2008 | 05:30 AM
  #100  
martha's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS Y'all!
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Apr 27 2008, 12:07 AM
Anything bigger than a Civic is just too big.


For right now I think the problem is the oil cartel and the market manipulation by big oil and those who profiteer from the increased prices.
1. What do you do if your family won't fit in a Civic. I have younger friends with 4-5 kids. A Civic is not going to haul them all around. Also, why is it ok for people to suck up fuel powering boats but not a vehicle large enough to carry your family?

2. For the most part, the "manipulation" has not been by the big oil companies. It is more a result of a flight to commodities as the dollar weakened and the economy started to tank. A measurable part of the increase in the price of crude is due to your friendly hedge funds and other speculators. And it doesn't appear to be headed for change anytime soon. (I added that comment because usually when I say things aren't going to change, they do and I'd like to see cheaper oil. )

3. In the case of the oil sands, etc., the price of getting the product out isn't cheap either in dollars or commodities. The U.S. is shipping diluent (naphtha is the preferred) into Canada for this purpose now. You're using a fairly pricey commodity to produce another. It becomes a point of diminishing returns.


Quick Reply: Cost of living



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 AM.