S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Cell Phones and driving.

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-19-2005, 10:21 AM
  #61  
Registered User
 
rjosey8385's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rockwall, TEXAS!
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lig,Jan 19 2005, 01:18 PM
I bet smoking kills more people than driving while talking.

Ban cigarettes!

liggy (a non-smoker)
I'm a non-smoker, too (except for a rare cigar), but my husband smokes and I know when he lights up in my S2000, he comes closer to death than he'll ever know
Old 01-19-2005, 10:25 AM
  #62  
lig
Community Organizer
Community Organizer
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: seattle
Posts: 11,207
Received 40 Likes on 17 Posts
Default



smoking in any of my cars?

Any guests who smoke @ my home are welcome to light up outside on the deck.

Your hubby is *cough* playing with fire when he lights up in the S
Old 01-19-2005, 11:49 AM
  #63  
Registered User

 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,323
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Based on personal experience, not any rigorous study:

1) Driving while talking on a cell phone is no more distracting or dangerous than driving while talking to a passenger.

2) Dialing a cell phone while driving is very dangerous, simply because of the amount of time it requires with the eyes off the road. Operating an iPod while driving is even worse. Swapping out CDs is pretty bad too. Rooting around the glove box for something as well. Reading a book or a newspaper or directions.

3) Driving a manual transmission car with only one hand (the other being occupied with cell phone, lunch, girlfriend or whatever) is dangerous due to a lack of control over the vehicle - ie, "Look ma, no hands!"
Old 01-19-2005, 12:12 PM
  #64  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: West Deptford NJ
Posts: 9,555
Received 146 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmc1971,Jan 19 2005, 02:20 PM
Cell phone use that leads to an accident should be covered by existing laws regarding negligence or unsafe driving.
I agree but that is not the case. If you read my post, that is a true story. The driver of the SUV was charged with leaving the scene of the accident and nothing else, served no time and paid no fine.

NJ now has a cell phone law, though it has made no difference, I still see plenty of people (mainly teens, certainly not exclusively) talking and driving, but paying much more attention to the former than the latter
Old 01-19-2005, 12:21 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
rjosey8385's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rockwall, TEXAS!
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zippy,Jan 19 2005, 03:12 PM
I agree but that is not the case. If you read my post, that is a true story. The driver of the SUV was charged with leaving the scene of the accident and nothing else, served no time and paid no fine.
It's negligent manslaughter and there should have been repercussions. For example, you're driving down the road and a child darts out in front of the car. You have little or no time to react and hit the child. That's involuntary and for that (provided you stop and render aid) you probably won't be fined or jailed. Now let's say you're driving down the street looking for a building on your left and there's a child just off the curb retrieving its ball from the side of the street. You're looking to the left for this building and the car veers to the right, hitting the child. That would be negligent (due to your inattentiveness) and you probably would be jailed, or at least fined and put on some kind of probation. So regardless of whether this woman was on her cell phone or just a huge dumbass, she should have been fined and/or jailed, and I'm sure state law provides for that.... somebody just let her off too easily.
Old 01-19-2005, 12:35 PM
  #66  
Registered User

 
Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Napa
Posts: 7,405
Received 1,103 Likes on 699 Posts
Default

josey, that was no lawyer joke, it's true. The guy was put to death at 12:01 this morning. That was his lawyers appeal basis.
Old 01-19-2005, 12:56 PM
  #67  
Gold Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,720
Received 1,494 Likes on 1,161 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Morris,Jan 19 2005, 04:35 PM
josey, that was no lawyer joke, it's true. The guy was put to death at 12:01 this morning. That was his lawyers appeal basis.
That shouldn't surprise anyone. The way things are today people will try anything, anytime, anywhere in order to win. Today we value winning more than we value fair play.

The lawyer probably figured that he'd take a shot, someone might just listen.

Of course this is a topic for a different thread.
Old 01-19-2005, 02:57 PM
  #68  
Registered User
 
jmc1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Zippy,Jan 19 2005, 04:12 PM
I agree but that is not the case. If you read my post, that is a true story. The driver of the SUV was charged with leaving the scene of the accident and nothing else, served no time and paid no fine.
If that's the case, then, IMO, the solution may be to amend the existing law regarding reckless driving or unsafe driving or whatever the state statutes say. I will never favor a law aimed solely at cell phones--and I don't even use one while driving! The real problem is driver inattention and, regardless of the source of the distraction, that's what should be fined or punished.

One day last week I was sitting second in line at a red light behind an SUV. Off to my right I heard the blaring siren of an ambulance that was approaching. The ambulance was making it's way through the intersection when my light turned green. The SUV ahead of me took off when the light turned and crossed directly into the path of the ambulance---which had to slam on brakes. On down the road when I passed the SUV I looked over and, sure enough, the driver was on the phone. (And it was a man!) What an idiot. I think he should be charged with reckless driving or something along those lines. This time he was on the phone, next time he may be digging wax out of his ears or playing with his PDA.
Old 01-19-2005, 02:59 PM
  #69  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: West Deptford NJ
Posts: 9,555
Received 146 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rjosey8385,Jan 19 2005, 04:21 PM
I'm sure state law provides for that....
It does now, but did not then. I was considered an "accident".
Old 01-19-2005, 04:59 PM
  #70  
Registered User

 
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 1,135
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lig,Jan 19 2005, 08:11 AM
Negligent drivers are going to be negligent no matter what.
I don't think so. I've been behind drivers using cell phones on several occasions when they hung up. In every case, their lanekeeping improved greatly and they sped up to the speed of traffic. Cell phone users are negligent drivers only when they are holding a cell phone to their ear.

uhhh... the last time I checked - theft is illegal and talking on a cell phone is not.
So when driving while using a cell phone becomes illegal in your state, you'll quit?


Quick Reply: Cell Phones and driving.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 AM.