S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Which car would you have bought?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-10-2005 | 11:10 PM
  #21  
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Somerville, MA, USA
Default

Oh, and about the Cooper S - I have a friend who has one and I tried hers out, though by that time I'd pretty much decided on the S2000. The Cooper S is the exact opposite of the S2000 in one way: it's got great torque and is great off the line, but it gets a lot less fun when the engine starts revving.

It does have the best moonroof I've ever seen, though - almost as much glass as a good T roof.
Old 01-11-2005 | 10:00 PM
  #22  
paS2K's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,875
Likes: 31
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Originally Posted by matrix,Jan 10 2005, 09:02 AM
Well, I almost bought a Z3 even though the S2000 existed!
....


There were not many choices in late 1999....and I had almost given up finding an S2000 @ msrp Lady Luck prevailed for me too
Old 01-12-2005 | 04:34 AM
  #23  
Palmateer's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
From: St. Pete, Florida
Default

The one I own now.

Trouble is, when I bought my S2000 in March of 2000, the 6-cylinder version of the Mercedes-Benz SLK was not yet available. When it became available in the Fall of 2000, it was way too expensive.

So I enjoyed owning an S2000 until 4 years later, when I was able to afford my used 2001 SLK 320.
Old 01-12-2005 | 07:10 AM
  #24  
Zeniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Vista, Texas
Default

Having been a 240Z owner in the past, I really looked hard at the 350Z Roadster. Two things brought me to the S2000, one the S feels more like a sports car should, and two, storage space. There is not enough room to carry my golf clubs in the 350Z Roadster. Also there will be a gizillion 350Z's on the road within a few years. The interior on the Z seems really cheap for a 34K car as well.

The Z3 also attracted my attention, but to get into the same performance range of the S you need the 3.0 and with options it becomes very expensive. Same goes for the Boxster.

I also owned a Triumph TR-6 at one time and the S evoked a lot of the same emotions while driving it, minus the maintenance issues with the TR.

In the end, I would have probably gotten the 350Z Roadster, it does have a lot of potential for performance upgrades that will make it an icon for Nissan, in the tradition of the old 240Z.
Old 01-12-2005 | 10:27 AM
  #25  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 1
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

I like Marco was going to go BMW.

I was saving my money for a used M Roadster.



See Dark Leader, I already had selected a color...
Old 01-12-2005 | 10:38 AM
  #26  
rjosey8385's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
From: Rockwall, TEXAS!
Default

Cooper S....but then I test drove the S2000 and realized how much better I'd look driving around town in that.

ps. Thanks Triple-H....now I'm gonna have nightmares Eeeeyyyyuuuuwww!
Old 01-13-2005 | 06:55 PM
  #27  
dlq04's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 42,343
Likes: 5,924
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

The looks of the Z3s never appealed to me.

The C5 Vette too common in MI, too wide, too soft, too plain (I must add I do like the new one better).

The new Viper too much $.

The Audi TT Turbo $10k more & a heafty 620 pounds more!

SLK lacked the goods for the track, too much $, too many pounds

Although it was not available when I got the S2000, I have since test driven both the tin top & drop top 350Z and found a lot to like but I didn't care for the drop top's looks - and like many of you I have got to have the wind-in-face to really soak up the whole experience.

There was speculation we would someday get the Lotus stateside but I recalled what the name stood for: Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious and felt it wasn't worth the wait.

The Boxster was on my short list but I felt it WAY over priced, the S model was almost $22k more! Even the std one was $16k more.

MR2 did not turn me on.

BMW M roadster -- I just could not get by the looks.

I suspect it would have been a Miata. I was test driving the various Miata suspension setups when I fell for the S2000.

Thank Goodness for the S2000! It has lived up to all my expectations.
Old 01-14-2005 | 12:25 PM
  #28  
dhayner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Default

The Boxter and MR-2 were the others that crossed my mind in 2001. The Boxster was too expensive and not as sporting, and the MR-2 was ugly and underpowered.

The S was a pretty easy choice.
Old 01-14-2005 | 07:12 PM
  #29  
trich1687's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Allentown
Default

For me (all used) it would have been a M roadster, C5 Zo6 ( C6 was not out yet) or a Boxter S . All said and done I am VERY happy with the S
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darkdream
Car and Bike Talk
165
12-22-2014 12:02 PM
ralper
S2000 Vintage Owners
11
05-12-2010 11:27 PM
robb
S2000 Vintage Owners
27
02-06-2004 03:49 PM
sehenkel
S2000 Talk
11
07-10-2002 02:36 PM



Quick Reply: Which car would you have bought?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 AM.