Another Take on Honda
#102
I only half agree with you. Where I disagree is that I do think that fuel economy and safety should be major considerations. Where I agree is that I don't think that having fuel economy and safety as major considerations gives Honda the license to produce bland, cheap looking, boring cars.
I also agree that much of the blame falls on American Honda. If they'd focus on the market the bottom line would take care of itself. Instead they've focused on the bottom line and seem to have forgotten their market.
I also agree that much of the blame falls on American Honda. If they'd focus on the market the bottom line would take care of itself. Instead they've focused on the bottom line and seem to have forgotten their market.
Fuel economy is relative, what one person thinks is horrible, another finds ok
I'm a pickup fan, and I will have one till the day I can no longer drive, yet I despise all things SUV
One of my all time favorite vehicles was my Titan, 5.6 V8, 5,000 pounds of brute force, 300+ hp and 400+ ft-lbs, when I saw 17 mpg it was a really good day, because I have a very heavy right foot, and I NEVER got tired of 400 ft-lbs
So to me, good fuel economy is a number that is much lower than it is to many, so when I see a 40 mpg from a car that would be so much better if it had a 30 mpg rating I just shake my head
American Honda sucks and John Mendel should be fired, that's my 2¢...
And for me, it always comes back to Nissan as an example, it's a COMPLETE car company, they have everything from pure electric for the greenies, to trucks that can tow 10,000 lbs, family sedans, economy cars, affordable sportscar, one of the best supercars, SUV's, Crossovers, they are involved in racing in a big way, and they have never felt the need to worship nothing but MPG, and for sure, they got some stuff that is polar opposite of bland! Different companies, different visions, Honda has lost the vision they used to have that I respected.
#103
Originally Posted by ralper' timestamp='1341353829' post='21832159
I only half agree with you. Where I disagree is that I do think that fuel economy and safety should be major considerations. Where I agree is that I don't think that having fuel economy and safety as major considerations gives Honda the license to produce bland, cheap looking, boring cars.
I also agree that much of the blame falls on American Honda. If they'd focus on the market the bottom line would take care of itself. Instead they've focused on the bottom line and seem to have forgotten their market.
I also agree that much of the blame falls on American Honda. If they'd focus on the market the bottom line would take care of itself. Instead they've focused on the bottom line and seem to have forgotten their market.
Fuel economy is relative, what one person thinks is horrible, another finds ok
I'm a pickup fan, and I will have one till the day I can no longer drive, yet I despise all things SUV
One of my all time favorite vehicles was my Titan, 5.6 V8, 5,000 pounds of brute force, 300+ hp and 400+ ft-lbs, when I saw 17 mpg it was a really good day, because I have a very heavy right foot, and I NEVER got tired of 400 ft-lbs
Of course fuel economy is a relative thing. I would never expect a full size SUV or for that matter your Nissan Titan to get the same miles per gallon as a Prius or a Civic, but I would expect all vehicles to be engineered to get the maximum fuel economy possible at the time. I don't mean economy at the sake of power, I mean better engineering to obtain the best of both worlds. While there will have to be some tradeoffs, I fully expect better engineering to give us the best of all worlds.
My point being that I can't see why we can't have safer, more fuel efficient cars that are fun to drive. I don't believe that fuel economy and safety have to lead to bland, boring vehicles. It only has to if the manufacturer allows it to happen. It especially didn't have to happen to Honda.
#104
Well Rob,
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
"I hate cars. I hate driving. I hate having to spend money on cars."* They've never pulled more than 2/10's of a G on corner in their life.
In their mind if you feel lateral load, your driving wrong.
If anything is exciting in the car, it reminds them that they wasted money on it.
I mean, is there any other reason that the Toyota Camry exists?
Ironically these will probably be the same people lined up around the block waiting to get theirs, when Google finally brings their self navigating car to the market.
*I work with some of these people. and yes those are real quotes.
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
"I hate cars. I hate driving. I hate having to spend money on cars."* They've never pulled more than 2/10's of a G on corner in their life.
In their mind if you feel lateral load, your driving wrong.
If anything is exciting in the car, it reminds them that they wasted money on it.
I mean, is there any other reason that the Toyota Camry exists?
Ironically these will probably be the same people lined up around the block waiting to get theirs, when Google finally brings their self navigating car to the market.
*I work with some of these people. and yes those are real quotes.
#105
Well Rob,
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
"I hate cars. I hate driving. I hate having to spend money on cars."* They've never pulled more than 2/10's of a G on corner in their life.
In their mind if you feel lateral load, your driving wrong.
If anything is exciting in the car, it reminds them that they wasted money on it.
I mean, is there any other reason that the Toyota Camry exists?
Ironically these will probably be the same people lined up around the block waiting to get theirs, when Google finally brings their self navigating car to the market.
*I work with some of these people. and yes those are real quotes.
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
"I hate cars. I hate driving. I hate having to spend money on cars."* They've never pulled more than 2/10's of a G on corner in their life.
In their mind if you feel lateral load, your driving wrong.
If anything is exciting in the car, it reminds them that they wasted money on it.
I mean, is there any other reason that the Toyota Camry exists?
Ironically these will probably be the same people lined up around the block waiting to get theirs, when Google finally brings their self navigating car to the market.
*I work with some of these people. and yes those are real quotes.
#106
My point being that I can't see why we can't have safer, more fuel efficient cars that are fun to drive. I don't believe that fuel economy and safety have to lead to bland, boring vehicles. It only has to if the manufacturer allows it to happen. It especially didn't have to happen to Honda.
Why do you think my next vehicle is going to be a Hyundai Veloster Turbo
#107
I don't think I know anybody like that though, seems family, friends, and co-workers.all have gasoline in their veins
#108
My +1 will tell you she's not a car person . . . that is until she spends time behind the wheel of a good one. She got to log a lot of miles in my A6 when I was in a hospital in OH and she really learned to love it over her Subaru.
#109
Originally Posted by ralper' timestamp='1341435524' post='21834244
My point being that I can't see why we can't have safer, more fuel efficient cars that are fun to drive. I don't believe that fuel economy and safety have to lead to bland, boring vehicles. It only has to if the manufacturer allows it to happen. It especially didn't have to happen to Honda.
Why do you think my next vehicle is going to be a Hyundai Veloster Turbo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Destiny2002
S2000 Talk
15
05-01-2003 07:01 AM