S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Another Take on Honda

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-03-2012 | 05:02 PM
  #101  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Morris
Rob, keep your eyes off them young college girls in halter tops. It could get ya in trouble....
Damn, I thought that's what orientation was all about.
Old 07-04-2012 | 08:53 AM
  #102  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 1
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by ralper
I only half agree with you. Where I disagree is that I do think that fuel economy and safety should be major considerations. Where I agree is that I don't think that having fuel economy and safety as major considerations gives Honda the license to produce bland, cheap looking, boring cars.

I also agree that much of the blame falls on American Honda. If they'd focus on the market the bottom line would take care of itself. Instead they've focused on the bottom line and seem to have forgotten their market.
I don't question safety, I'm more than ok to see progress there, my brother was killed in a car...
Fuel economy is relative, what one person thinks is horrible, another finds ok
I'm a pickup fan, and I will have one till the day I can no longer drive, yet I despise all things SUV
One of my all time favorite vehicles was my Titan, 5.6 V8, 5,000 pounds of brute force, 300+ hp and 400+ ft-lbs, when I saw 17 mpg it was a really good day, because I have a very heavy right foot, and I NEVER got tired of 400 ft-lbs
So to me, good fuel economy is a number that is much lower than it is to many, so when I see a 40 mpg from a car that would be so much better if it had a 30 mpg rating I just shake my head

American Honda sucks and John Mendel should be fired, that's my 2¢...

And for me, it always comes back to Nissan as an example, it's a COMPLETE car company, they have everything from pure electric for the greenies, to trucks that can tow 10,000 lbs, family sedans, economy cars, affordable sportscar, one of the best supercars, SUV's, Crossovers, they are involved in racing in a big way, and they have never felt the need to worship nothing but MPG, and for sure, they got some stuff that is polar opposite of bland! Different companies, different visions, Honda has lost the vision they used to have that I respected.
Old 07-04-2012 | 12:58 PM
  #103  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Triple-H
Originally Posted by ralper' timestamp='1341353829' post='21832159
I only half agree with you. Where I disagree is that I do think that fuel economy and safety should be major considerations. Where I agree is that I don't think that having fuel economy and safety as major considerations gives Honda the license to produce bland, cheap looking, boring cars.

I also agree that much of the blame falls on American Honda. If they'd focus on the market the bottom line would take care of itself. Instead they've focused on the bottom line and seem to have forgotten their market.
I don't question safety, I'm more than ok to see progress there, my brother was killed in a car...
Fuel economy is relative, what one person thinks is horrible, another finds ok
I'm a pickup fan, and I will have one till the day I can no longer drive, yet I despise all things SUV
One of my all time favorite vehicles was my Titan, 5.6 V8, 5,000 pounds of brute force, 300+ hp and 400+ ft-lbs, when I saw 17 mpg it was a really good day, because I have a very heavy right foot, and I NEVER got tired of 400 ft-lbs

Of course fuel economy is a relative thing. I would never expect a full size SUV or for that matter your Nissan Titan to get the same miles per gallon as a Prius or a Civic, but I would expect all vehicles to be engineered to get the maximum fuel economy possible at the time. I don't mean economy at the sake of power, I mean better engineering to obtain the best of both worlds. While there will have to be some tradeoffs, I fully expect better engineering to give us the best of all worlds.

My point being that I can't see why we can't have safer, more fuel efficient cars that are fun to drive. I don't believe that fuel economy and safety have to lead to bland, boring vehicles. It only has to if the manufacturer allows it to happen. It especially didn't have to happen to Honda.
Old 07-05-2012 | 03:47 AM
  #104  
boltonblue's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 32,542
Likes: 4,158
From: bolton
Default

Well Rob,
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
"I hate cars. I hate driving. I hate having to spend money on cars."* They've never pulled more than 2/10's of a G on corner in their life.
In their mind if you feel lateral load, your driving wrong.
If anything is exciting in the car, it reminds them that they wasted money on it.
I mean, is there any other reason that the Toyota Camry exists?

Ironically these will probably be the same people lined up around the block waiting to get theirs, when Google finally brings their self navigating car to the market.



*I work with some of these people. and yes those are real quotes.
Old 07-05-2012 | 04:07 AM
  #105  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,737
Likes: 1,497
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue
Well Rob,
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
"I hate cars. I hate driving. I hate having to spend money on cars."* They've never pulled more than 2/10's of a G on corner in their life.
In their mind if you feel lateral load, your driving wrong.
If anything is exciting in the car, it reminds them that they wasted money on it.
I mean, is there any other reason that the Toyota Camry exists?

Ironically these will probably be the same people lined up around the block waiting to get theirs, when Google finally brings their self navigating car to the market.



*I work with some of these people. and yes those are real quotes.
I absolutely agree with you, and that is exactly why Toyota exists and prospers. There is, however, another segment in the market that wants a bit more from a car. I'm not talking about enthusiasts who buy S2000s and read Motor Trend every month, I'm talking about the segment of everyday people who want a good, reliable, safe, economical car that also feels good to drive. There are plenty of these people around. My wife is one. She couldn't care less about sports cars or motorsports, but she wants a car that she can rely on and that feels good in her hands. That is the audience that Honda used to play to until it fell asleep, became afraid of the recession and allowed American Honda to convince the company to become Toyota.
Old 07-05-2012 | 05:06 AM
  #106  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 1
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by ralper
My point being that I can't see why we can't have safer, more fuel efficient cars that are fun to drive. I don't believe that fuel economy and safety have to lead to bland, boring vehicles. It only has to if the manufacturer allows it to happen. It especially didn't have to happen to Honda.
Believe me, we are on the same page here...

Why do you think my next vehicle is going to be a Hyundai Veloster Turbo
Old 07-05-2012 | 05:11 AM
  #107  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 1
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue
I think a big part of the problem lies in the public.
It appears that a huge chunk of the buying public wants toasters. They want bland, Point A to Point B, transportation. An appliance that will simply get them there.
Interesting, never really thought about it that way, I can see your point though

I don't think I know anybody like that though, seems family, friends, and co-workers.all have gasoline in their veins
Old 07-05-2012 | 05:46 AM
  #108  
dlq04's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 42,334
Likes: 5,919
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

My +1 will tell you she's not a car person . . . that is until she spends time behind the wheel of a good one. She got to log a lot of miles in my A6 when I was in a hospital in OH and she really learned to love it over her Subaru.
Old 07-05-2012 | 10:06 AM
  #109  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,713
Likes: 234
Default

Originally Posted by Triple-H
Originally Posted by ralper' timestamp='1341435524' post='21834244
My point being that I can't see why we can't have safer, more fuel efficient cars that are fun to drive. I don't believe that fuel economy and safety have to lead to bland, boring vehicles. It only has to if the manufacturer allows it to happen. It especially didn't have to happen to Honda.
Believe me, we are on the same page here...

Why do you think my next vehicle is going to be a Hyundai Veloster Turbo
Yeah, because MORE POWER! and a poorly set suspension is really exciting! Add in a mouth from a carp and I can see why you're all for it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dlq04
S2000 Talk
10
06-21-2003 07:56 AM
Destiny2002
S2000 Talk
15
05-01-2003 07:01 AM
ASIMO
Car and Bike Talk
7
03-14-2003 09:38 PM
Bukwheat
S2000 Talk
3
11-06-2002 06:50 AM



Quick Reply: Another Take on Honda



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:29 AM.