will test pipe increase performance on N/A S2000
#12
Originally posted by mikecl713
would it be worth it for a comptech supercharged?
would it be worth it for a comptech supercharged?
#13
[QUOTE]Originally posted by JL9000
I am quite familiar with the search function thank you very much.
I am an engineering student, and I've done several dyno-comparisons myself. I never cared for the internet hear-says that people use to pretend they are smart, I just want to see proof. So please enlighten me if you have real knowledge of this subject. Thanks.
Sure. You'll get improved performance and some weight reduction. And it isn't all that expensive either, especially if you make one yourself. [/QUOTE
I am an engineer and I can bearly afford the S2k... What type of money are u guys from......
I am quite familiar with the search function thank you very much.
I am an engineering student, and I've done several dyno-comparisons myself. I never cared for the internet hear-says that people use to pretend they are smart, I just want to see proof. So please enlighten me if you have real knowledge of this subject. Thanks.
Sure. You'll get improved performance and some weight reduction. And it isn't all that expensive either, especially if you make one yourself. [/QUOTE
I am an engineer and I can bearly afford the S2k... What type of money are u guys from......
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: sechs.eins.f
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about I clear this up real quick.... and I will surely back JL9000 on this . I have seen dyno plots with just an exhaust and test pipe gain hp throughout the RPM range. The two S2k's gained about 2.3 - 2.7 at top end power and lost nothing at the lower range of RPM's and if I can get the dyno sheets from them I will post them up for the concern and provide beneficial information. I love running the test pipe...clears up weight and exhaust flow. Thats my .02 cents though.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed better response and more power when I had a test pipe put in. Problem is it is so loud
Many of my friends who rode in my car also stated that it felt much more powerful. I'll have to race my friends modified lt1 and let you know if I am any faster or not. Also it is much easier to get going from first for some reason
Many of my friends who rode in my car also stated that it felt much more powerful. I'll have to race my friends modified lt1 and let you know if I am any faster or not. Also it is much easier to get going from first for some reason
#17
Registered User
The myth of needing "backpressure" to avoid mid range or low end torque is one of those Internet half-truths that just never seems to go away. The issue is a not particularly complex engineering concept - it involves the behavior of heated gases in a tube of a specific diameter and length; maximum power is almost always achieved when the exhaust valve tuning (overlap, etc) and the resulting pulse of the air in the exhaust are optimized. This is what crossover H-pipes and X-pipes on true dual systems can accomplish, and why nearly all NASCAR racers use X-pipes since the shape more precisely aligns the exhaust pulses.
All things being equal, the test pipe should yield a bit more ponies up top with no loss anywhere else. However, if the resonator (using Helmholtz principles and equations) is used not only to tune the sound but also to optimize the exhaust pulse in a certain region (like the mid power range) typically by a resonance peak, then it is possible that one might lose that peak by adding a straight pipe - you have changed a signficant part of the total equation.
Now, I have not the foggiest notion of what the result is on the S2000. We would have to see those back to back dynos runs using identical units and especially inlet air temps.
All things being equal, the test pipe should yield a bit more ponies up top with no loss anywhere else. However, if the resonator (using Helmholtz principles and equations) is used not only to tune the sound but also to optimize the exhaust pulse in a certain region (like the mid power range) typically by a resonance peak, then it is possible that one might lose that peak by adding a straight pipe - you have changed a signficant part of the total equation.
Now, I have not the foggiest notion of what the result is on the S2000. We would have to see those back to back dynos runs using identical units and especially inlet air temps.
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BustedShox
How about I clear this up real quick.... and I will surely back JL9000 on this . I have seen dyno plots with just an exhaust and test pipe gain hp throughout the RPM range. The two S2k's gained about 2.3 - 2.7 at top end power and lost nothing at the lower range of RPM's and if I can get the dyno sheets from them I will post them up for the concern and provide beneficial information. I love running the test pipe...clears up weight and exhaust flow. Thats my .02 cents though.
How about I clear this up real quick.... and I will surely back JL9000 on this . I have seen dyno plots with just an exhaust and test pipe gain hp throughout the RPM range. The two S2k's gained about 2.3 - 2.7 at top end power and lost nothing at the lower range of RPM's and if I can get the dyno sheets from them I will post them up for the concern and provide beneficial information. I love running the test pipe...clears up weight and exhaust flow. Thats my .02 cents though.
I would love to see the results of adding the testpipe for myself....