What mechanical components prevent 04 s2k from reving to 9k
12-08-2003, 09:28 AM
#21
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 12m SW of Glen Rose, Tx
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
7 Posts
Latin lesson for today: The singular of indices is index.
index_______ indices
appendix ____appendices
matrix_______matrices
Rolex________Rolices? maybe not
Sometimes it just slips out. But a true pedant would more likely complain about saying "indexes," which is in fact acceptable grammar, rather than the classic "indices." That I'd ignore, but indice is not a word at all.
And of course I was setting up the joke about two watches being Rolices, which obviously was a dismal failure.
Gregg
index_______ indices
appendix ____appendices
matrix_______matrices
Rolex________Rolices? maybe not
Originally posted by Road Rage
We are playing school marm now? - being a bit of a pedant I'd say.
We are playing school marm now? - being a bit of a pedant I'd say.
And of course I was setting up the joke about two watches being Rolices, which obviously was a dismal failure.
Gregg
12-08-2003, 02:19 PM
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gregg and Glenn,
Do you guys think the piston wobble component of the equation can be elimated or reduced by the new manufacturing process?
Luis, why so bitter about the new car?
-Lee
Do you guys think the piston wobble component of the equation can be elimated or reduced by the new manufacturing process?
Luis, why so bitter about the new car?
-Lee
12-08-2003, 04:07 PM
#29
Originally posted by Luis
Unfortunately the F22C and F20C don't rev to the same limit.
Unfortunately the F22C and F20C don't rev to the same limit.
It's fine IMNSHO to go a bit off topic, but to deny the original topic altogether is just plain wrong.
Me thinks you're getting your back up because Greg Lee is a pedantic grammar nazi (not that there's anything wrong with that
).
12-08-2003, 08:38 PM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: baltimore
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, the actual acceleration on a pistion (for all the equation lovers out there) is
r=stroke of engine
l=rod length center to center
w=angular velocity of crank shaft
t = time
a= -r*w^2*(cos(w*t)+(r*cos(w*t)^2)/(l*(1-(r/l.*sin(w*t))^2)^5)*sec(asin(r/l*sin(w*t)))-sin(w*t)*tan(asin(r/l*sin(w*t))))
if someone can give me the rod length of the engines (F20c and F22C) and the stroke of the engines, i can create some graphs so we can see what the accleration(and forces) on the pistons would be at 9000
-Jon
r=stroke of engine
l=rod length center to center
w=angular velocity of crank shaft
t = time
a= -r*w^2*(cos(w*t)+(r*cos(w*t)^2)/(l*(1-(r/l.*sin(w*t))^2)^5)*sec(asin(r/l*sin(w*t)))-sin(w*t)*tan(asin(r/l*sin(w*t))))
if someone can give me the rod length of the engines (F20c and F22C) and the stroke of the engines, i can create some graphs so we can see what the accleration(and forces) on the pistons would be at 9000
-Jon